Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953025›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2022

Phenotypic analysis of the pediatric immune response to SARS-CoV-2 by flow cytometry.

Freya Sibbertsen, Laura Glau, Kevin Paul, Thomas S Mir, Søren W Gersting, Eva Tolosa, Gabor A Dunay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic analysis of the pediatric immune response to SARS-CoV-2 by flow cytometry.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Freya SibbertsenUniversity Children's Research, UCR@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-1582
Laura GlauInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kevin PaulUniversity Children's Research, UCR@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0998-4881
Thomas S MirDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-5187
Søren W GerstingUniversity Children's Research, UCR@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-4748
Eva TolosaInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gabor A DunayUniversity Children's Research, UCR@Kinder-UKE, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-1505

Funding

Carlsen VerlagDamp StiftungDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TO235/8-2Dr. Melitta Berkemann StiftungEAGLES Charity Golf Club e.V.Fördergemeinschaft Kinderkrebs-Zentrum Hamburg e.V.Freunde der Kinderklinik des UK Eppendorf e.V.HSV Fussball AGJoachim-Herz-StiftungKroschke StiftungMichael Otto StiftungMichael Stich StiftungNutriciaSenate Chancellery of the Free and Hanseatic City of HamburgStiftung KinderHerzZeit-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection is often mild or asymptomatic and the immune responses of children are understudied compared to adults. Here, we present and evaluate the performance of a two-panel (16- and 17 parameter) flow cytometry-based approach for immune phenotypic analysis of cryopreserved PBMC samples from children after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The panels were optimized based on previous SARS-CoV-2 related studies for the pediatric immune system. PBMC samples from seven SARS-CoV-2 seropositive children from early 2020 and five age-matched healthy controls were stained for analysis of T-cells (panel T), B and innate immune cells (panel B). Performance of the panels was evaluated in two parallel approaches, namely classical manual gating of known subpopulations and unbiased clustering using the R-based algorithm PhenoGraph. Using manual gating we clearly identified 14 predefined subpopulations of interest for panel T and 19 populations in panel B in low-volume pediatric samples. PhenoGraph found 18 clusters within the T-cell panel and 21 clusters within the innate and B-cell panel that could be unmistakably annotated. Combining the data of the two panels and analysis approaches, we found expected differentially abundant clusters in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive children compared to healthy controls, underscoring the value of these two panels for the analysis of immune response to SARS-CoV-2. We established a two-panel flow cytometry approach that can be used with limited amounts of cryopreserved pediatric samples. Our workflow allowed for a rapid, comprehensive, and robust pediatric immune phenotyping with comparable performance in manual gating and unbiased clustering. These panels may be adapted for large multi-center cohort studies to investigate the pediatric immune response to emerging virus variants in the ongoing and future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChildFlow CytometryHumansImmunityLeukocytes, MononuclearB-cellschildrenCOVID-19innate cellsPhenoGraphSARS-CoV-2T-cellsUMAP

Identifiers

PMID34953025
PMCPMC9015535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.