Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953014›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Rapid processing and quantitative evaluation of structural brain scans for adaptive multimodal imaging.

František Váša, Harriet Hobday, Ryan A Stanyard, Richard E Daws, Vincent Giampietro, Owen O'Daly, David J Lythgoe, Jakob Seidlitz, Stefan Skare, Steven C R Williams and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structural MRI of brain similarity networks.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  2. Human adolescent brain similarity development is different for paralimbic versus neocortical zones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Focused Abbreviated Survey MRI Protocols for Brain and Spine Imaging.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

František VášaDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6744-7139
Harriet HobdayDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ryan A StanyardDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard E DawsThe Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vincent GiampietroDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Owen O'DalyDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David J LythgoeDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jakob SeidlitzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stefan SkareDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Steven C R WilliamsDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Andre F MarquandDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Robert LeechDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
James H ColeDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-5588
King's College London · GBChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USKarolinska University Hospital · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUK Dementia Research Institute · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R024790/2Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering WT 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current neuroimaging acquisition and processing approaches tend to be optimised for quality rather than speed. However, rapid acquisition and processing of neuroimaging data can lead to novel neuroimaging paradigms, such as adaptive acquisition, where rapidly processed data is used to inform subsequent image acquisition steps. Here we first evaluate the impact of several processing steps on the processing time and quality of registration of manually labelled T

Indexed as

BrainNeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingReproducibility of ResultsEPImixfingerprintingidentifiabilitymorphometric similarityMRIreliabilitystructural covariance

Identifiers

PMID34953014
PMCPMC8886661
OpenAlexW4200587532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.