Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953005›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2022

Intracavitary electrocardiography for femorally inserted central catheter tip location in adult patients.

YingFang Duan, XiaoYan Hu, YuXin Zhu, Xi Zhao, XinXin Yin, HaiMan Zhang, Yu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intracavitary electrocardiography for femorally inserted central catheter tip location in adult patients.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

YingFang DuanOncology Department Ⅳ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
XiaoYan HuOncology Department Ⅳ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-6779
YuXin ZhuOncology Department Ⅱ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xi ZhaoOncology Department Ⅳ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
XinXin YinOncology Department Ⅱ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
HaiMan ZhangOncology Department Ⅳ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yu WangOncology Department Ⅳ, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
First Hospital of Shijiazhuang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, the intracavitary electrocardiogram (ECG) P-wave and QRS-wave changes during femorally inserted central catheter (FICC) placement in adults were observed with the aim of reducing malposition occurrence. The observed method provides venous access in patients who have limited upper limb venous catheterization potential and require medium-term and long-term infusions.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 34 adult patients who underwent FICC placement was conducted. After body surface measurements were taken, all patients were connected to an ECG during catheter placement, and the P-wave and QRS-wave changes were observed. Next, the catheter tip position was confirmed with an abdominal X-ray, and an analysis of the changes occurring during the procedure was conducted.

resultsIn the 34 patients included in the present study, the catheter tips were located below the diaphragm level in the inferior vena cava. Of the patients, 18 showed negative P waves, biphasic P waves, and positive high-amplitude P waves with increasing the insertion depth. In 16 patients, no P-wave characteristic changes were observed during catheterization, and an abdominal X-ray confirmed that the catheter tip was positioned below the level of the first lumbar vertebra.

conclusionNegative P waves, biphasic P waves, and positive high-amplitude P waves appeared during FICC placement in adults. Catheter withdrawal until the P wave reverted to normal indicated that a tip position close to the inferior vena cava above the diaphragm level was ideal.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersAdultElectrocardiographyHumansRetrospective Studieselectrocardiogram localizationFICCP waveQRS waveveins of lower limbs

Identifiers

PMID34953005
PMCPMC8916572
OpenAlexW4200235686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.