Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952926›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2023

Differences in personal care product use by race/ethnicity among women in California: implications for chemical exposures.

Hannah N Collins, Paula I Johnson, Norma Morga Calderon, Phyllis Y Clark, April D Gillis, Amy M Le, Dung Nguyen, Caroline Nguyen, Lisa Fu, Tiffany O'Dwyer and 1 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Young infants' exposure to parabens: lotion use as a potential source of exposure.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and Infertility Among US Reproductive-Aged Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  20. Indoor air pollution and airway health.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah N CollinsCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Paula I JohnsonCalifornia Safe Cosmetics Program, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA.
Norma Morga CalderonCHAMACOS, Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas, Salinas, CA, USA.
Phyllis Y ClarkHealthy Heritage Movement, Riverside, CA, USA.
April D GillisHealthy Heritage Movement, Riverside, CA, USA.
Amy M LeCalifornia Safe Cosmetics Program, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA.
Dung NguyenCalifornia Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative, Oakland, CA, USA.
Caroline NguyenCalifornia Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative, Oakland, CA, USA.
Lisa FuCalifornia Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative, Oakland, CA, USA.
Tiffany O'DwyerCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kim G HarleyCenter for Environmental Research and Children's Health, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. kharley@berkeley.edu.
California Health Collaborative · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCenter for Environmental Health · USClinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal care products may contain many chemicals, some of which are suspected endocrine disrupters. This is an important source of chemical exposure for women, but little is known about how chemical exposure differs among different races/ethnicities.

objectiveThis study examines differences in personal care product use among Black, Latina, Vietnamese, Mixed Race, and White women in California.

methodsWe used a community-based participatory process to create and administer a personal care product usage survey to 321 Black, Latina, Vietnamese, Mixed Race, and White women. We used multivariate regression models with pairwise comparisons to examine the frequency of product use by race/ethnicity.

resultsWe found distinct trends of personal care product use by race/ethnicity: Latina women typically used makeup most frequently; Black women used certain hair products or styles most frequently; and Vietnamese women were most likely to use facial cleansing products compared to other races/ethnicities. Latina and Vietnamese women were less likely to try to avoid certain ingredients in their products. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings can help estimate disparities in chemical exposure from personal care product use and complement future research on health inequities due to chemical exposures in the larger environmental and social context.

Indexed as

CosmeticsEthnicityBlack or African AmericanCaliforniaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansWhiteCosmeticsChemical exposureCosmeticsHealth disparitiesPersonal care products

Identifiers

PMID34952926
PMCPMC10005944
OpenAlexW4200334726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read86
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.