Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952856›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2021

Durability of effects from short-term economic incentives for clinic attendance among HIV positive adults in Tanzania: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Carolyn A Fahey, Prosper F Njau, Nicole K Kelly, Rashid S Mfaume, Patrick T Bradshaw, William H Dow, Sandra I McCoy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01957917 (Comparing Food and Cash Assistance for HIV-Positive Men and Women on Antiretroviral Therapy in Tanzania), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01957917 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Food and Cash Assistance for HIV-Positive Men and Women on Antiretroviral Therapy in Tanzania

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, BerkeleyRan2013 to 2019Enrolled800ConditionsHIVArmsNAC (Nutritional Assessment and Counseling), Cash Transfer, Food Assistance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn A FaheyEpidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA cfahey@berkeley.edu.
Prosper F NjauMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Nicole K KellyEpidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1061-2767
Rashid S MfaumeMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Patrick T BradshawEpidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
William H DowHealth Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Sandra I McCoyEpidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4764-9195
University of California, Berkeley · USMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Effectiveness of a short-term incentive program for HIV treatment adherence, retention, and re-engagement in careR21MH115802 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MCCOY, SANDRA I · 2018 to 2019
$340k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH115802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConditional economic incentives are shown to promote medication adherence across a range of health conditions and settings; however, any long-term harms or benefits from these time-limited interventions remain largely unevaluated. We assessed 2-3 years outcomes from a 6-month incentive programme in Tanzania that originally improved short-term retention in HIV care and medication possession.

methodsWe traced former participants in a 2013-2016 trial, which randomised 800 food-insecure adults starting HIV treatment at three clinics to receive either usual care (control) or up to 6 months of cash or food transfers (~US$11/month) contingent on timely attendance at monthly clinic appointments. The primary intention-to-treat analysis estimated 24-month and 36-month marginal risk differences (RD) between incentive and control groups for retention in care and all-cause mortality, using multiple imputation for a minority of missing outcomes. We also estimated mortality HRs from time-stratified Cox regression.

resultsFrom 3 March 2018 to 19 September 2019, we determined 36-month retention and mortality statuses for 737 (92%) and 700 (88%) participants, respectively. Overall, approximately 660 (83%) participants were in care at 36 months while 43 (5%) had died. There were no differences between groups in retention at 24 months (86.5% intervention vs 84.4% control, RD 2.1, 95% CI -5.2 to 9.3) or 36 months (83.3% vs 77.8%, RD 5.6, -2.7 to 13.8), nor in mortality at either time point. The intervention group had a lower rate of death during the first 18 months (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.74); mortality was similar thereafter (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.79).

conclusionThese findings confirm that incentives are a safe and effective tool to promote short-term adherence and potentially avert early deaths at the critical time of HIV treatment initiation. Complementary strategies are recommended to sustain lifelong retention in HIV care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01957917.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMotivationAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedication AdherenceTanzaniaepidemiologyhealth services researchHIVrandomised control trialtreatment

Identifiers

PMID34952856
PMCPMC8710859
OpenAlexW4200091561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.