Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952733›Full record

Observational studyChild abuse & neglect2022

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on child abuse and neglect: A cross-sectional study in a French Child Advocacy Center.

L Massiot, E Launay, J Fleury, C Poullaouec, M Lemesle, C Gras-le Guen, N Vabres

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Child abuse & neglect, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L MassiotChild Advocacy Center, Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
E LaunayPediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France; Clinical Investigation Center 0004, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France. Electronic address: elise.launay@chu-nantes.fr.
J FleuryChild Advocacy Center, Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France; Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
C PoullaouecChild Advocacy Center, Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France; Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
M LemesleChild Advocacy Center, Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
C Gras-le GuenPediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France; Clinical Investigation Center 0004, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
N VabresChild Advocacy Center, Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France; Pediatric Department, Nantes University Hospital, 7 quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, France.
Hôpital Mère-Enfant · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in France on the activity of a Child Advocacy Center.

methodsThis cross-sectional, observational study included all children involved in the activity of the CAC during the first lockdown, from March 16 to May 10, 2020 and the next 3 months and the corresponding periods in 2018 and 2019. Cases were considered severe when a hospitalization, social alert and/or judicial report to the prosecutor was decided.

resultsData for 1583 children were analyzed. During the lockdown, the global center activity decreased with 26.4 consultations per 100.000 children in 2018, 46 in 2019 and 20.7 in 2020 (p < 0.001). Judicial activity decreased (forensic examinations and child forensic interview recordings), whereas assessment consultations increased. Cases were more severe during the lockdown than in 2019 and 2018 (12.3, 9.4 and 6.04/100.000 children, respectively, p < 0.0001). The global activity of the center increased in the 3 months after the lockdown as compared with during the lockdown (38.2/100.000 versus 20.7/100.000, respectively, p < 0.001) but did not differ from activity in 2018 and 2019. Severe cases were more frequent in the 3 months after the lockdown than the previous years (13.7/100.000 in 2020, 9.62 in 2019 and 8.17 in 2018, p = 0.0002).

conclusionThe CAC activity decreased during the lockdown in France but the increase in incidence of severe abuse cases during the lockdown and the next 3 months confirm the need for optimal screening, care and support of child abuse and neglect victims even in the context of health crisis.

Indexed as

Child AbuseCOVID-19ChildChild AdvocacyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsChild abuse and neglectChild advocacy centerCOVID-19Lockdown

Identifiers

PMID34952733
PMCPMC9741962
OpenAlexW4200105257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.