Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952640›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2021

IDH-wild type glioblastomas featuring at least 30% giant cells are characterized by frequent RB1 and NF1 alterations and hypermutation.

Valeria Barresi, Michele Simbolo, Andrea Mafficini, Maurizio Martini, Martina Calicchia, Maria Liliana Piredda, Chiara Ciaparrone, Giada Bonizzato, Serena Ammendola, Maria Caffo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of the Type and Degree of Genomic Instability in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Solitary subependymal giant cell astrocytoma lacking TSC1/2 mutations and TTF-1 expression: A potential diagnostic pitfall.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Case report: GermlineFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. iScience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria BarresiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. valeria.barresi@univr.it.
Michele SimboloDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea MafficiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maurizio MartiniUnit of Anatomic Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy.
Martina CalicchiaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria Liliana PireddaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Chiara CiaparroneDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giada BonizzatoARC-NET Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Serena AmmendolaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria CaffoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giampietro PinnaDepartment of Neurosciences, Unit of Neurosurgery, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesco SalaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicines and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Rita Teresa LawlorARC-NET Research Centre, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudio GhimentonDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell glioblastoma (GC-GBM) is a rare variant of IDH-wt GBM histologically characterized by the presence of numerous multinucleated giant cells and molecularly considered a hybrid between IDH-wt and IDH-mutant GBM. The lack of an objective definition, specifying the percentage of giant cells required for this diagnosis, may account for the absence of a definite molecular profile of this variant. This study aimed to clarify the molecular landscape of GC-GBM, exploring the mutations and copy number variations of 458 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in 39 GBMs dichotomized into having 30-49% (15 cases) or ≥ 50% (24 cases) GCs. The type and prevalence of the genetic alterations in this series was not associated with the GCs content (< 50% or ≥ 50%). Most cases (82% and 51.2%) had impairment in TP53/MDM2 and PTEN/PI3K pathways, but a high proportion also featured TERT promoter mutations (61.5%) and RB1 (25.6%) or NF1 (25.6%) alterations. EGFR amplification was detected in 18% cases in association with a shorter overall survival (P = 0.004). Sixteen (41%) cases had a TMB > 10 mut/Mb, including two (5%) that harbored MSI and one with a POLE mutation. The frequency of RB1 and NF1 alterations and TMB counts were significantly higher compared to 567 IDH wild type (P < 0.0001; P = 0.0003; P < 0.0001) and 26 IDH-mutant (P < 0.0001; P = 0.0227; P < 0.0001) GBMs in the TCGA PanCancer Atlas cohort. These findings demonstrate that the molecular landscape of GBMs with at least 30% giant cells is dominated by the impairment of TP53/MDM2 and PTEN/PI3K pathways, and additionally characterized by frequent RB1 alterations and hypermutation and by EGFR amplification in more aggressive cases. The high frequency of hypermutated cases suggests that GC-GBMs might be candidates for immune check-point inhibitors clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeurofibromin 1Retinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesYoung AdultIsocitrate DehydrogenaseNeurofibromin 1NF1 protein, humanRB1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesGiant cellGlioblastomaMismatch repairRB1Tumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID34952640
PMCPMC8709962
OpenAlexW4200032118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.