Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952582›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Evaluation of a social determinants of health screening questionnaire and workflow pilot within an adult ambulatory clinic.

Rachel L Berkowitz, Linh Bui, Zijun Shen, Alice Pressman, Maria Moreno, Stephanie Brown, Anne Nilon, Chris Miller-Rosales, Kristen M J Azar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safeguarding Social Determinants of Health Data at a Managed Health Plan.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. The 'PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel L Berkowitz *Department of Public Health and Recreation, College of Health and Human Sciences, San José State University, One Washington Square, San José, CA, 95192, USA.
Linh Bui *Sutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Zijun ShenSutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Alice PressmanSutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Maria MorenoSutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Stephanie BrownSutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Anne NilonSutter Health Population Health Services, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA.
Chris Miller-RosalesDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Kristen M J AzarSutter Health Institute for Advancing Health Equity, 2121 N. California Blvd, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596, USA. azark@sutterhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-7717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increased recognition in clinical settings of the importance of documenting, understanding, and addressing patients' social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health and address health inequities. This study evaluated a pilot of a standardized SDOH screening questionnaire and workflow in an ambulatory clinic within a large integrated health network in Northern California.

methodsThe pilot screened for SDOH needs using an 11-question Epic-compatible paper questionnaire assessing eight SDOH and health behavior domains: financial resource, transportation, stress, depression, intimate partner violence, social connections, physical activity, and alcohol consumption. Eligible patients for the pilot receiving a Medicare wellness, adult annual, or new patient visits during a five-week period (February-March, 2020), and a comparison group from the same time period in 2019 were identified. Sociodemographic data (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment type), visit type, length of visit, and responses to SDOH questions were extracted from electronic health records, and a staff experience survey was administered. The evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

resultsTwo-hundred eighty-nine patients were eligible for SDOH screening. Responsiveness by domain ranged from 55 to 67%, except for depression. Half of patients had at least one identified social need, the most common being stress (33%), physical activity (22%), alcohol (12%), and social connections (6%). Physical activity needs were identified more in females (81% vs. 19% in males, p < .01) and at new patient/transfer visits (48% vs. 13% at Medicare wellness and 38% at adult wellness visits, p < .05). Average length of visit was 39.8 min, which was 1.7 min longer than that in 2019. Visit lengths were longer among patients 65+ (43.4 min) and patients having public insurance (43.6 min). Most staff agreed that collecting SDOH data was relevant and accepted the SDOH questionnaire and workflow but highlighted opportunities for improvement in training and connecting patients to resources.

conclusionUse of evidence-based SDOH screening questions and associated workflow was effective in gathering patient SDOH information and identifying social needs in an ambulatory setting. Future studies should use qualitative data to understand patient and staff experiences with collecting SDOH information in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Health InequitiesSocial Determinants of HealthAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedicareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkflowAmbulatory settingEvaluationImplementation scienceInterventionRE-AIMSocial determinants of health screening

Identifiers

PMID34952582
PMCPMC8708511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.