Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952565›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

cDNA-detector: detection and removal of cDNA contamination in DNA sequencing libraries.

Meifang Qi, Utthara Nayar, Leif S Ludwig, Nikhil Wagle, Esther Rheinbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contamination Survey of Insect Genomic and Transcriptomic Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meifang QiCenter for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-3110
Utthara NayarHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9024-6084
Leif S LudwigHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2916-2164
Nikhil WagleHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Esther RheinbayCenter for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. erheinbay@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-6729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExogenous cDNA introduced into an experimental system, either intentionally or accidentally, can appear as added read coverage over that gene in next-generation sequencing libraries derived from this system. If not properly recognized and managed, this cross-contamination with exogenous signal can lead to incorrect interpretation of research results. Yet, this problem is not routinely addressed in current sequence processing pipelines.

resultsWe present cDNA-detector, a computational tool to identify and remove exogenous cDNA contamination in DNA sequencing experiments. We demonstrate that cDNA-detector can identify cDNAs quickly and accurately from alignment files. A source inference step attempts to separate endogenous cDNAs (retrocopied genes) from potential cloned, exogenous cDNAs. cDNA-detector provides a mechanism to decontaminate the alignment from detected cDNAs. Simulation studies show that cDNA-detector is highly sensitive and specific, outperforming existing tools. We apply cDNA-detector to several highly-cited public databases (TCGA, ENCODE, NCBI SRA) and show that contaminant genes appear in sequencing experiments where they lead to incorrect coverage peak calls.

conclusionscDNA-detector is a user-friendly and accurate tool to detect and remove cDNA detection in NGS libraries. This two-step design reduces the risk of true variant removal since it allows for manual review of candidates. We find that contamination with intentionally and accidentally introduced cDNAs is an underappreciated problem even in widely-used consortium datasets, where it can lead to spurious results. Our findings highlight the importance of sensitive detection and removal of contaminant cDNA from NGS libraries before downstream analysis.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingComputer SimulationDNA, ComplementaryGene LibrarySequence Analysis, DNADNA, ComplementarycDNAContaminationGenomicsQuality controlSoftware

Identifiers

PMID34952565
PMCPMC8709999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.