Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952540›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2022

DNA strand break induction of aqueous plasmid DNA exposed to 30 MeV protons at ultra-high dose rate.

Daisuke Ohsawa, Yota Hiroyama, Alisa Kobayashi, Tamon Kusumoto, Hisashi Kitamura, Satoru Hojo, Satoshi Kodaira, Teruaki Konishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of FLASH proton therapy on primary bronchial epithelial cell organoids.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke OhsawaSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Yota HiroyamaSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Alisa KobayashiSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Tamon KusumotoSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Hisashi KitamuraRadiation Measurement Research Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Satoru HojoCyclotron Operation Section, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Satoshi KodairaSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Teruaki KonishiSingle Cell Radiation Biology Group, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology · JP

Funding

KAKENHI JP 20H03634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation cancer therapy with ultra-high dose rate exposure, so called FLASH radiotherapy, appears to reduce normal tissue damage without compromising tumor response. The aim of this study was to clarify whether FLASH exposure of proton beam would be effective in reducing the DNA strand break induction. We applied a simple model system, pBR322 plasmid DNA in aqueous 1 × TE solution, where DNA single strand breaks (SSBs) and double strand breaks (DSBs) can be precisely quantified by gel electrophoresis. Plasmid DNA were exposed to 27.5 MeV protons in the conventional dose rate of 0.05 Gy/s (CONV) and ultra-high dose rate of 40 Gy/s (FLASH). With both dose rate, the kinetics of the SSB and DSB induction were proportional to absorbed dose. The SSB induction of FLASH was significantly less than CONV, which were 8.79 ± 0.14 (10-3 SSB per Gy per molecule) and 10.8 ± 0.68 (10-3 SSB per Gy per molecule), respectively. The DSB induction of FLASH was also slightly less than CONV, but difference was not significant. Altogether, 27.5 MeV proton beam at 40 Gy/s reduced SSB and not DSB, thus its effect may not be significant in reducing lethal DNA damage that become apparent in acute radiation effect.

Indexed as

DNA DamageProtonsDNADose-Response Relationship, RadiationPlasmidsWaterDNAProtonsWaterDNA strand breaksFLASHhigh dose rateplasmid DNAproton

Identifiers

PMID34952540
PMCPMC8944314
OpenAlexW4200594197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.