Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952538›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Irreversible specialization for speech perception in early international adoptees.

Gunnar Norrman, Emanuel Bylund, Guillaume Thierry

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Gunnar NorrmanCentre for Research on Bilingualism, Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-6777
Emanuel BylundCentre for Research on Bilingualism, Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guillaume ThierrySchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.
Stockholm University · SEBangor University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early childhood, the human brain goes through a period of tuning to native speech sounds but retains remarkable flexibility, allowing the learning of new languages throughout life. However, little is known about the stability over time of early neural specialization for speech and its influence on the formation of novel language representations. Here, we provide evidence that early international adoptees, who lose contact with their native language environment after adoption, retain enhanced sensitivity to a native lexical tone contrast more than 15 years after being adopted to Sweden from China, in the absence of any pretest familiarization with the stimuli. Changes in oscillatory brain activity showed how adoptees resort to inhibiting the processing of defunct phonological representations, rather than forgetting or replacing them with new ones. Furthermore, neurophysiological responses to native and nonnative contrasts were not negatively correlated, suggesting that native language retention does not interfere with the acquisition of adoptive phonology acquisition. These results suggest that early language experience provides strikingly resilient specialization for speech which is compensated for through inhibitory control mechanisms as learning conditions change later in life.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionBrainChild, PreschoolHumansLanguageLearningPhoneticsSpeechcritical periodevent-related brain potentialsinternational adoptionlanguage acquisitionmismatch negativity

Identifiers

PMID34952538
PMCPMC9433419
OpenAlexW4200558704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.