Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952401›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2022

Misoprostol and estradiol to enhance visualization of the transformation zone during cervical cancer screening: An integrative review.

Simon M Manga, Kaitlyn D Kincaid, Teresa K L Boitano, Alan T Tita, Isabel C Scarinci, Warner K Huh, Margaret I Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon M MangaWomen's Health Program, Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Services, P.O. Box 1, Bamenda, Cameroon; Center for Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 619(TH) Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-7333, USA. Electronic address: smanga@cbchealthservices.org.
Kaitlyn D KincaidDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10360, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Teresa K L BoitanoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10360, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Alan T TitaCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 619(TH) Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-7333, USA; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Isabel C ScarinciCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 619(TH) Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-7333, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10250, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Warner K HuhCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 619(TH) Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-7333, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10250, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Margaret I LiangCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10270, 619(TH) Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249-7333, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 176F Suite 10250, 1700 6(th) Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCameroon Baptist Convention Health Services · CM

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this integrative literature review was to appraise studies conducted worldwide using misoprostol and estradiol in converting Type 3 transformation zone (TZ) of the cervix into Types 1 or 2 and to assess which regimen could be more feasible in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We reviewed the English language literature for peer-reviewed studies that evaluated strategies to convert Type 3 TZs to Types 1 or 2 for cervical cancer screening. Web of Science and PubMed searches were performed up to July 2020. Search terms included: "cervical colposcopy," "inadequate colposcopy", "cervical cancer screening", "transformation zone," "estrogen", "estradiol", and "misoprostol." Inclusion criteria were articles published in the English language, original research, and peer reviewed articles. A total of 127 articles were abstracted, 24 articles were reviewed, and 9 articles met all inclusion criteria. We found that intravaginal misoprostol, intravaginal estradiol, and oral estradiol can successfully convert Type 3 TZ to Types 1 or 2. A single dose of vaginal misoprostol had a similar maximum response rate (20-80%) to a multi-dose regimen over several days or weeks of both intravaginal estradiol (64-83%) and oral estradiol (50-70%). Misoprostol administration was associated with more side effects such as abdominal cramping and vaginal bleeding compared to estradiol, although these were generally mild. In conclusion, Oral estradiol, intravaginal estradiol, and intravaginal misoprostol can be used to convert Type 3 TZ to Types 1 or 2. Intravaginal misoprostol is well tolerated and more feasible in LMICs due to availability and shorter treatment schedule compared to oral or intravaginal estradiol.

Indexed as

MisoprostolOxytocicsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdministration, IntravaginalCervical RipeningEarly Detection of CancerEstradiolFemaleHumansPregnancyEstradiolMisoprostolOxytocicsCervical cancer screeningColposcopyDeveloping countriesEstradiolMisoprostolTransformation zone

Identifiers

PMID34952401
PMCPMC10958763
OpenAlexW3216100848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.