Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952356›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2022

Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele.

Jos H Verbeek, Paul Whaley, Rebecca L Morgan, Kyla W Taylor, Andrew A Rooney, Lukas Schwingshackl, Jan L Hoving, S Vittal Katikireddi, Beverley Shea, Reem A Mustafa and 2 more

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jos H VerbeekCochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.h.a.m.verbeek@amsterdamumc.nl.
Paul WhaleyLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK.
Rebecca L MorganMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Kyla W TaylorNational Institute of Environment Health Science, United States.
Andrew A RooneyNational Institute of Environment Health Science, United States.
Lukas SchwingshacklMedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan L HovingCochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S Vittal KatikireddiUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
Beverley SheaUniversity of Ottawa, Canada.
Reem A MustafaUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, United States.
M Hassan MuradMayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Holger J SchünemannMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

Scientific Cyberinfrastructure Research ProgramZIAES103385 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, VICKIE · 2022 to 2025
$17.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Systematic Reviews as TopicDisease ProgressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID34952356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.