Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34952208›Full record

SynthesisAgeing research reviews2022

Modifiable lifestyle factors and cognitive reserve: A systematic review of current evidence.

Suhang Song, Yaakov Stern, Yian Gu

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ageing research reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suhang SongTaub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Yaakov SternTaub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Yian GuTaub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Joseph P. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: yg2121@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Exploring Cognitive Aging Using Reference Ability Neural NetworksR01AG038465 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HABECK, CHRISTIAN GEORG, STERN, YAAKOV · 2011 to 2025
$17.0M
Imaging of Cognition, Learning and Memory in AgingR01AG026158 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 2004 to 2021
$10.9M
The role of inflammation in the association between diet and Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG059013 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GU, YIAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Diet and Cognition within a Reserve frameworkR01AG061008 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GU, YIAN · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Collaboratory on Research Definitions for Cognitive Reserve and ResilienceR24AG061421 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 2018 to 2020
$2.5M
Imaging of Cognition, Learning and Memory in AgingR56AG026158 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 2010 to 2010
$379k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026158NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038465NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059013NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061008NIA NIH HHS R24 AG061421NIA NIH HHS R56 AG026158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to summarize cognitive reserve (CR) evaluation approaches and to examine the role of seven selected modifiable lifestyle factors (diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, cognitive leisure activity, sleep, and meditation) in mitigating the impacts of age- or disease-related brain changes on cognition. Eighteen population-based English empirical studies were included. We summarize the study designs and identify three CR models that were broadly used in these studies, including a residual model assessing lifestyle factors in relation to unexplained variance in cognition after accounting for brain markers, a moderation model testing whether lifestyle factors moderate the relationship between brain status and cognition, and a controlling model examining the associations between lifestyle factors and cognition when controlling for brain measures. We also present the findings for the impact of each lifestyle factor. No studies examined diet, sleep, or meditation, and only two studies focused on smoking and alcohol consumption each. Overall, the studies suggest lifestyle activity factors (physical and cognitive leisure activities) may contribute to CR and attenuate the damaging impact of brain changes on cognition. Standardized measurements of lifestyle factors and CR are needed, and mechanisms underlying CR need to be further addressed as well.

Indexed as

Cognitive ReserveBrainCognitionExerciseHumansLife StyleBrain markersCognitionCognitive reserveModifiable lifestyle factors

Identifiers

PMID34952208
PMCPMC8794051
OpenAlexW4200219305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.