Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951726›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2022

Influence of liver stiffness heterogeneity on staging fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Nobuyoshi Kawamura, Kento Imajo, Kyle J Kalutkiewicz, Koki Nagai, Michihiro Iwaki, Takashi Kobayashi, Asako Nogami, Yasushi Honda, Takaomi Kessoku, Yuji Ogawa and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Fontan-Associated Liver Disease.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Nobuyoshi KawamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-3534
Kento ImajoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kyle J KalutkiewiczDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Koki NagaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Michihiro IwakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Asako NogamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6923-365X
Yasushi HondaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takaomi KessokuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takuma HigurashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kunihiro HosonoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hirokazu TakahashiDivision of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2374-2889
Masato YonedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoru SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Shinichi AishimaDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki City, Japan.
Hideki HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu City, Japan.
Yoshio SumidaDepartment of Hepatology and Pancreatology, Aichi Medical University of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Richard L EhmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPKawasaki Hospital · JPMayo Clinic · USSaga University · JPAichi Medical University · JPGifu Municipal Hospital · JPOgaki Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR37EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R37 EB001981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDespite that hepatic fibrosis often affects the liver globally, spatial distribution can be heterogeneous. This study aimed to investigate the effect of liver stiffness (LS) heterogeneity on concordance between MR elastography (MRE)-based fibrosis staging and biopsy staging in patients with NAFLD. APPROACH AND

resultsWe retrospectively evaluated data from 155 NAFLD patients who underwent liver biopsy and 3 Tesla MRE and undertook a retrospective validation study of 169 NAFLD patients at three hepatology centers. Heterogeneity of stiffness was assessed by measuring the range between minimum and maximum MRE-based LS measurement (LSM). Variability of LSM was defined as the stiffness range divided by the maximum stiffness value. The cohort was divided into two groups (homogenous or heterogeneous), according to whether variability was below or above the average for the training cohort. Based on histopathology and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, optimum LSM thresholds were determined for MRE-based fibrosis staging of stage 4 (4.43, kPa; AUROC, 0.89) and stage ≥3 (3.93, kPa; AUROC, 0.89). In total, 53 had LSM above the threshold for stage 4. Within this group, 30 had a biopsy stage of <4. In 86.7% of these discordant cases, variability of LSM was classified as heterogeneous. In MRE-based LSM stage ≥3, 88.9% of discordant cases were classified as heterogeneous. Results of the validation cohort were similar to those of the training cohort.

conclusionsDiscordance between biopsy- and MRE-based fibrosis staging is associated with heterogeneity in LSM, as depicted with MRE.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiopsyHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34951726
PMCPMC9307017
OpenAlexW4200035535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.