Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951632›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2022

Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together.

Nancy Berlinger, Kate de Medeiros, Laura Girling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bioethics in Gerontology: Developing a Typology of Ethical Issues in Assisted Living.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy BerlingerResearch Department, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York, USA.
Kate de MedeirosDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3995-3170
Laura GirlingDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hastings Center · USMiami University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

Exploring COVID-19’s Impact on the Care and Well-being of Community Dwelling Persons with DementiaR21AG059149 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI GIRLING, LAURA · 2019 to 2020
$760k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as "health humanities," shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.

Indexed as

BioethicsGeriatricsHealth EquityHumanitiesHumansSocial JusticeBioethicsHealth humanitiesPopulation agingSocial justice

Identifiers

PMID34951632
PMCPMC9451011
OpenAlexW4200101046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.