Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951601›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Text Mining of Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: Deep Learning Approach.

Daphne Chopard, Matthias S Treder, Padraig Corcoran, Nagheen Ahmed, Claire Johnson, Monica Busse, Irena Spasic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daphne ChopardSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-1681
Matthias S TrederSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5955-2326
Padraig CorcoranSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-3385
Nagheen AhmedCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-0244
Claire JohnsonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3022
Monica BusseCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5909
Irena SpasicSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8132-3885

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacovigilance and safety reporting, which involve processes for monitoring the use of medicines in clinical trials, play a critical role in the identification of previously unrecognized adverse events or changes in the patterns of adverse events.

objectiveThis study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of automating the coding of adverse events described in the narrative section of the serious adverse event report forms to enable statistical analysis of the aforementioned patterns.

methodsWe used the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) as the coding scheme, which integrates 217 source vocabularies, thus enabling coding against other relevant terminologies such as the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine). We used MetaMap, a highly configurable dictionary lookup software, to identify the mentions of the UMLS concepts. We trained a binary classifier using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), a transformer-based language model that captures contextual relationships, to differentiate between mentions of the UMLS concepts that represented adverse events and those that did not.

resultsThe model achieved a high F1 score of 0.8080, despite the class imbalance. This is 10.15 percent points lower than human-like performance but also 17.45 percent points higher than that of the baseline approach.

conclusionsThese results confirmed that automated coding of adverse events described in the narrative section of serious adverse event reports is feasible. Once coded, adverse events can be statistically analyzed so that any correlations with the trialed medicines can be estimated in a timely fashion.

Indexed as

classificationdeep learningmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID34951601
PMCPMC8742206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.