Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951552›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2022

The experiences and beliefs of people with severe haemophilia and healthcare professionals on pain management, and their views of using exercise as an aspect of intervention: a qualitative study.

P McLaughlin, M Hurley, P Chowdary, D Stephensen, K Khair

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Subjective Physical Performance and Its Determinants in Patients With Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  4. The effects of traumatic pain memories on current pain experience in men with hemophilia.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Promoting physical activity for people with haemophilia in the age of new treatments.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

P McLaughlinSt George's University of London and Kingston University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-7647
M HurleySt George's University of London and Kingston University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6106-2895
P ChowdaryKatharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-8586
D StephensenEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-3343
K KhairCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Child Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID) Research Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2001-5958
St George's, University of London · GBEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the experiences, views and beliefs of people with severe haemophilia and healthcare professionals (HCPs) on approaches for pain management, as well as their views on exercise being used as an aspect of management.

methodsTaking a qualitative inquiry approach using focus groups and semi-structured interviews, participants included people with severe haemophilia living with chronic pain and haemophilia HCPs. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsFourteen men with haemophilia with a median age of 47 (range 23-73) and six haemophilia HCPs agreed to participate. Of the people with haemophilia, 11 attended two focus groups and three were interviewed over telephone. Healthcare professionals were interviewed face-to-face. Two themes were conceptualised from the data: (i) haemophilia management and pain management is discordant (imbalance between good haemophilia care but poor pain management, historical medico-social influences on pain management, the need for trust); (ii) uncertain about exercise but clear on what matters (conflicting views on exercise, the need for proof of safety, personalised care).

conclusionsOptions for effective pain management remain limited and what is used is heavily influenced by beliefs and experience. Exercise as a treatment option in pain management is conceptually acceptable for people with haemophilia. Effective pain management requires understanding of individual beliefs and fears, and a personalised approach supported by knowledgeable, trusted clinicians.Implications for rehabilitationMusculoskeletal joint pain and its relationship with bleeding in people with haemophilia continues to be a management challenge.Current pain management strategies are of limited effectiveness with little evidence of an approach that reflects the multi-modal pain experience.Whilst exercise and rehabilitation approaches are conceptually possible for people with severe haemophilia, barriers remain regarding perception of overall safety and effectiveness.People with severe haemophilia may consider exercise as part of a pain management strategy if it is individualised, and they are supported to do it by clinicians who understand them and their haemophilia.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHemophilia ADelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansMalePain ManagementQualitative ResearchexerciseHaemophiliapain managementrare diseasereflexive thematic analysisrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34951552
PMCPMC12011021
OpenAlexW4200414671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.