ArticleTransfusion2022
Characterization and first-in-human clinical dose-escalation safety evaluation of a next-gen human freeze-dried plasma.
Article in Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next generation spray-dried on-demand plasma: A multicenter, randomized, dose-escalation, first-in-human safety study.Transfusion · 2026Trial
- From Donation to Innovation: New Blood-Derived Products.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Dried plasma retains hemostatic function and thermal stability during Arctic military operations.Transfusion · 2026Article
- Improved platelet recovery in cryopreserved platelets reconstituted in freeze-dried plasma.Transfusion · 2026Article
- An experimental comparison and user evaluation of three different dried plasma products.Vox sanguinis · 2025Article
- Dried Plasma for Major Trauma: Past, Present, and Future.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Novel blood derived hemostatic agents for bleeding therapy and prophylaxis.Current opinion in hematology · 2022Review
- Characterization and first-in-human clinical dose-escalation safety evaluation of a next-gen human freeze-dried plasma.Transfusion · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly plasma transfusion is life-saving for bleeding trauma patients. Freeze-dried plasma (FDP) provides unique formulation advantages for infusion in the prehospital setting. We describe characterization and clinical safety data of the first, next-generation FDP stored in plastic bags with rapid reconstitution. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsCoagulation and chemistry parameters on 155 pairs of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and their derivative FDP units were compared. Next, a first-in-human, dose-escalation safety evaluation of FDP, involving 24 healthy volunteers who donated either whole blood or apheresis plasma to create autologous FDP, was performed in three dose cohorts (270, 540, and 810 ml) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Cohort 3 was randomized, double-blind with a cross-over arm that compared FDP versus FFP using descriptive analysis for AEs, coagulation, hematology, and chemistry parameters.
resultsFDP coagulation factors, clotting times, and product quality (pH, total protein, and osmolality) post-lyophilization were preserved. FDP infusions, of up to 810 ml per subject, were found to be safe and with no serious AEs (SAEs) related to FDP. The average time to reconstitute FDP was 67 s (range: 43-106). No differences in coagulation parameters or thrombin activation were detected in subjects infused with 810 ml of FDP compared with FFP.
conclusionThis first next-generation FDP product preserves the potency and safety of FFP in a novel rugged, compressible, plastic container, for rapid transfusion, allowing rapid access to plasma in resuscitation protocols for therapy in acute traumatic hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.