ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2022
Development and validation of prediction models for neurocognitive disorders in adult patients admitted to the ICU with sleep disturbance.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between sleep disorder and delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Development and validation comparison of multiple models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders during hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for sleep disorders among pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Prediction of early bladder outcomes after spinal cord injury: The HALT score.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Improved prediction of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in intensive care unit sepsis patients with an innovative nomogram tool.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A narrative review focusing on diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Development and validation of prediction models for neurocognitive disorders in adult patients admitted to the ICU with sleep disturbance.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2022Article
- J-Shaped Association Between Respiratory Rate and In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Complicated by Congestive Heart Failure in Intensive Care Unit.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurocognitive disorders (NCDs) and sleep disturbance are highly prevalent in the perioperative period and intensive care unit (ICU). There has been a lack of individualized evaluation tools designed for the high-risk NCDs in critically ill patients with sleep disturbance.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop and validate prediction models for NCDs among adult patients with sleep disturbance.
methodsThe R software was used to analyze the dataset of adult patients admitted to the ICU with sleep disturbance, who were diagnosed following the codes of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) and 10th Revision (ICD-10) using the MIMIC-IV database. We used logistic regression and LASSO analyses to identify important risk factors associated with NCDs and develop nomograms for NCDs predictions. We measured the performances of the nomograms using the bootstrap resampling procedure, sensitivity, specificity of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the ROC curves (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe prediction models shared the 10 risk factors (age, gender, midazolam, morphine, glucose, diabetes diseases, potassium, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, and respiratory rate). Cardiovascular diseases were included in the logistic regression, the sensitivity was 74.1%, and specificity was 64.6%. When platelet and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) were included and cardiovascular diseases were removed in the LASSO prediction model, the sensitivity was 86.1% and specificity was 82.8%. Discriminative abilities of the logistic prediction and LASSO prediction models for NCDs in the validation set were evaluated as the AUC scores, which were 0.730 (95% CI 0.716-0.743) and 0.920 (95% CI 0.912-0.927). Net benefits of the prediction models were observed at threshold probabilities of 0.567 and 0.914.
conclusionsThe LASSO prediction model showed better performance than the logistic prediction model and should be preferred for nomogram-assisted decisions on clinical risk management of NCDs among adult patients with sleep disturbance in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.