Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951129›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

A semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model incorporating autoinduction for the dose justification of TAS-114.

Hikari Araki, Toru Takenaka, Koichi Takahashi, Fumiaki Yamashita, Kazuaki Matsuoka, Kunihiro Yoshisue, Ichiro Ieiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative approaches to drug safety: The 2022 PSP special issue.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hikari ArakiPharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-9975
Toru TakenakaPharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Koichi TakahashiPharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Fumiaki YamashitaPharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kazuaki MatsuokaPharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kunihiro YoshisuePharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ichiro IeiriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taiho Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TAS-114 is a dual deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor expected to widen the therapeutic index of capecitabine. Its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined from a safety perspective in a combination study with capecitabine; however, its inhibitory effects on DPD activity were not assessed in the study. The dose justification to select its MTD as the recommended dose in terms of DPD inhibition has been required, but the autoinduction profile of TAS-114 made it difficult. To this end, an approach using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model incorporating autoinduction was planned; however, the utility of this approach in the dose justification has not been reported. Thus, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification via a case study of TAS-114. Plasma concentrations of TAS-114 from 185 subjects and those of the endogenous DPD substrate uracil from 24 subjects were used. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time and an enzyme turnover model were selected for the pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Moreover, an indirect response model was selected for the PD model to capture the changes in plasma uracil concentrations. Model-based simulations provided the dose justification that DPD inhibition by TAS-114 reached a plateau level at the MTD, whereas exposures of TAS-114 increased dose dependently. Thus, the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification was demonstrated via this case study of TAS-114.

Indexed as

PyrimidinesSulfonamidesCapecitabineEnzyme InhibitorsHumansUracilCapecitabineEnzyme InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesTAS-114Uracil

Identifiers

PMID34951129
PMCPMC9124359
OpenAlexW4200073565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.