Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34951030›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2022

Expected and observed in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Introduction of the machine learning-based standardized mortality ratio at Helios hospitals.

Sebastian König, Vincent Pellissier, Johannes Leiner, Sven Hohenstein, Laura Ueberham, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Ralf Kuhlen, Gerhard Hindricks, Andreas Bollmann, Helios hospitals

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sebastian KönigDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-3052
Vincent PellissierLeipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig Heart Digital, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes LeinerDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sven HohensteinLeipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig Heart Digital, Leipzig, Germany.
Laura UeberhamDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas Meier-HellmannHelios Hospitals, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf KuhlenHelios Health, Berlin, Germany.
Gerhard HindricksDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas BollmannDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Helios hospitals

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduced hospital admission rates for heart failure (HF) and evidence of increased in-hospital mortality were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to apply a machine learning (ML)-based mortality prediction model to examine whether the latter is attributable to differing case mixes and exceeds expected mortality rates. METHODS AND

resultsInpatient cases with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF non-electively admitted to 86 German Helios hospitals between 01/01/2016 and 08/31/2020 were identified. Patients with proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. ML-based models were developed, tuned, and tested using cases of 2016-2018 (n = 64,440; randomly split 75%/25%). Extreme gradient boosting showed the best model performance indicated by a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.882 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.872-0.893). The model was applied on data sets of 2019 and 2020 (n = 28,556 cases) and the hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR) was computed as the observed to expected death ratio. Observed mortality rates were 5.84% (2019) and 6.21% (2020), HSMRs based on an individual case-based mortality probability were 100.0 (95% CI: 93.3-107.2; p = 1.000) for 2019 and 99.3 (95% CI: 92.5-106.4; p = .850) for 2020. Within subgroups of age or hospital volume, there were no significant differences between observed and expected deaths. When stratified for pandemic phases, no excess death during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed.

conclusionApplying an ML algorithm to calculate expected inpatient mortality based on administrative data, there was no excess death above expected event rates in HF patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart FailureHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansMachine LearningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2administrative dataCOVID-19 pandemicheart failuremachine learningmortality prediction

Identifiers

PMID34951030
PMCPMC8799043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.