ArticleMachine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop)2020
Robust Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Inpainting with Edge Prior.
Article in Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of lesion filling on brain age estimation in multiple sclerosis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- The role of AI for MRI-analysis in multiple sclerosis-A brief overview.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- FastSurfer parcellation accuracy after lesion filling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Inpainting Missing Tissue in Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inpainting lesions is an important preprocessing task for algorithms analyzing brain MRIs of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, such as tissue segmentation and cortical surface reconstruction. We propose a new deep learning approach for this task. Unlike existing inpainting approaches which ignore the lesion areas of the input image, we leverage the edge information around the lesions as a prior to help the inpainting process. Thus, the input of this network includes the T1-w image, lesion mask and the edge map computed from the T1-w image, and the output is the lesion-free image. The introduction of the edge prior is based on our observation that the edge detection results of the MRI scans will usually contain the contour of white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM), even though some undesired edges appear near the lesions. Instead of losing all the information around the neighborhood of lesions, our approach preserves the local tissue shape (brain/WM/GM) with the guidance of the input edges. The qualitative results show that our pipeline inpaints the lesion areas in a realistic and shape-consistent way. Our quantitative evaluation shows that our approach outperforms the existing state-of-the-art inpainting methods in both image-based metrics and in FreeSurfer segmentation accuracy. Furthermore, our approach demonstrates robustness to inaccurate lesion mask inputs. This is important for practical usability, because it allows for a generous over-segmentation of lesions instead of requiring precise boundaries, while still yielding accurate results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.