Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34950782›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications for bile duct stones in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

Hirokazu Saito, Yoshihiro Kadono, Takashi Shono, Kentaro Kamikawa, Atsushi Urata, Jiro Nasu, Haruo Imamura, Ikuo Matsushita, Tatsuyuki Kakuma, Shuji Tada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hirokazu SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology Kumamoto City Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8729-9604
Yoshihiro KadonoDepartment of Gastroenterology Tsuruta Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Takashi ShonoDepartment of Gastroenterology Kumamoto Chuo Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Kentaro KamikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Atsushi UrataDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Jiro NasuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Kumamoto Chuo Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Haruo ImamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Ikuo MatsushitaDepartment of Gastroenterology Kumamoto Chuo Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Tatsuyuki KakumaDepartment of Biostatics Center, Medical School Kurume University Kurume Japan.
Shuji TadaDepartment of Gastroenterology Kumamoto City Hospital Kumamoto City Japan.
Kumamoto City Hospital · JPSaiseikai Kumamoto Hospital · JPKurume University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimCurrent guidelines recommend the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. We conducted this study because of the limited research comparing the risks of ERCP-related complications between these two groups.

methodsThis retrospective study involved 1491 patients with native major duodenal papilla diagnosed with choledocholithiasis at three institutions in Japan. The rates of ERCP-related complications, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), cholangitis, bleeding, and perforation, were compared using one-to-one propensity score matching between the asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

resultsComplications were observed in 112 (7.5%) of the 1491 patients (asymptomatic group: 31/172 [18.0%]

conclusionsERCP for asymptomatic patients with CBD stones is associated with a higher risk of overall and severe complications than that for symptomatic patients with CBD stones; the overall rate is influenced by the high incidence of PEP in the asymptomatic group. Endoscopists should explain the risk of ERCP-related complications for asymptomatic patients before performing the procedure.

Indexed as

common bile duct stonecomplicationendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographysymptom

Identifiers

PMID34950782
PMCPMC8674545
OpenAlexW4200328439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.