Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34950579›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Comparative Efficacy of Systemic Agents for Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With an EGFR Mutation/ALK Rearrangement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Shervin Taslimi, Karanbir Brar, Yosef Ellenbogen, Jiawen Deng, Winston Hou, Fabio Y Moraes, Michael Glantz, Brad E Zacharia, Aaron Tan, Manmeet S Ahluwalia and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Shervin TaslimiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Karanbir BrarFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yosef EllenbogenDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jiawen DengFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Winston HouFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Fabio Y MoraesDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Michael GlantzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.
Brad E ZachariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.
Aaron TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Manmeet S AhluwaliaRose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Mustafa KhasrawThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Alireza MansouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, United States.
Queen's University · CAPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USMcMaster University · CACleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases (BM) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are frequent and carry significant morbidity, and current management options include varying local and systemic therapies. Here, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the ideal treatment regimen for NSCLC BMs with targetable EGFR-mutations/ALK-rearrangements.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL and references of key studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception until June 2020. Comparative RCTs including ≥10 patients were selected. We used a frequentist random-effects model for network meta-analysis (NMA) and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcome of interest was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS).

resultsWe included 24 studies representing 19 trials with 1623 total patients. Targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly improved iPFS, with second-and third- generation TKIs showing the greatest benefit (HR=0.25, 95%CI 0.15-0.40). Overall PFS was also improved compared to conventional chemotherapy (HR=0.47, 95%CI 0.36-0.61). In EGFR-mutant patients, osimertinib showed the greatest benefit in iPFS (HR=0.32, 95%CI 0.15-0.69) compared to conventional chemotherapy, while gefitinib + chemotherapy showed the greatest overall PFS benefit (HR=0.26, 95%CI 0.10-0.70). All ALKi improved overall PFS compared to conventional chemotherapy, with alectinib having the greatest benefit (HR=0.13, 95%CI 0.07-0.24).

conclusionsIn patients with NSCLC BMs and EGFR/ALK mutations, targeted TKIs improve intracranial and overall PFS compared to conventional modalities such as chemotherapy, with greater efficacy seen using newer generations of TKIs. This data is important for treatment selection and patient counseling, and highlights areas for future RCT research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=179060.

Indexed as

ALK inhibitorsbrain metastasesEGFR inhibitorsneuro-oncologynon-small cell lung cancertargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID34950579
PMCPMC8691653
OpenAlexW4200497550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.