ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2021
Cost-Efficient Video Synthesis and Evaluation for Development of Virtual 3D Endoscopy.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing cystoscopy and TURBT: enhanced imaging and artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Virtual simulator for cystoscopy containing motion blur and bladder debris to aid the development of clinical tools.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Fiberscopic pattern removal for optimal coverage in 3D bladder reconstructions of fiberscope cystoscopy videos.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Towards improved 3D reconstruction of cystoscopies through real-time feedback for frame reacquisition.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objective3D reconstruction of the shape and texture of hollow organs captured by endoscopy is important for the diagnosis and surveillance of early and recurrent cancers. Better evaluation of 3D reconstruction pipelines developed for such applications requires easy access to extensive datasets and associated ground truths, cost-efficient and scalable simulations of a range of possible clinical scenarios, and more reliable and insightful metrics to assess performance.
methodsWe present a computer-aided simulation platform for cost-effective synthesis of monocular endoscope videos and corresponding ground truths that mimic a range of potential settings and situations one might encounter during acquisition of clinical endoscopy videos. Using cystoscopy of the bladder as model case, we generated an extensive dataset comprising several synthesized videos of a bladder phantom. We then introduce a novel evaluation procedure to reliably assess an individual 3D reconstruction pipeline or to compare different pipelines.
resultsTo illustrate the use of the proposed platform and evaluation procedure, we use the aforementioned dataset and ground truths to evaluate a proprietary 3D reconstruction pipeline (CYSTO3D) for bladder cystoscopy videos and compared it with a general-purpose 3D reconstruction pipeline (COLMAP). The evaluation results provide insight into the suggested clinical acquisition protocol and several potential areas for refinement of the pipeline to improve future performance.
conclusionOur work proposes an endoscope video synthesis and reconstruction evaluation toolset and presents experimental results that illustrate usage of the toolset to efficiently assess performance and reveal possible problems of any given 3D reconstruction pipeline, to compare different pipelines, and to provide technically or clinically actionable insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.