Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34950266›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2021

The prevalence of, and risk factors for, Barrett's oesophagus after sleeve gastrectomy.

Marcin Migaczewski, Agata Czerwińska, Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Piotr Zarzycki, Magdalena Pisarska, Justyna Rymarowicz, Michał Pędziwiatr, Piotr Major

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcin Migaczewski2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Agata Czerwińska2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Zarzycki2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Pisarska2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Justyna Rymarowicz2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Major2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSleeve gastrectomy has become one of the most performed bariatric procedures. There is increasing evidence that sleeve gastrectomy patients suffer from gastroesophageal reflux disease and its sequelae such as erosive oesophagitis (EO) or Barret's oesophagus (BO).

aimTo evaluate the incidence of EO and BO among patients with normal preoperative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, and investigate factors that may contribute to the development of EO and BO after the surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a single-centre longitudinal study that included patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and completed 5 years of follow-up. Gastroscopies were performed in all patients at the end of the follow-up period. Patient- and treatment-related factors were used to search for risk factors of BO.

resultsFrom a total of 30 patients, symptomatic reflux was reported by 17 (56.7%) during the follow-up period. At EGD EO was found in 9 of those patients (30%), whereas BE was diagnosed in 8 (27%) patients. The median BMI at the end of the follow-up period was significantly higher among patients with BE than in the groups with EO and with no endoscopic changes: 40.91 ±6.32, 32.42 ±5.53, and 33.25 ±4.41, respectively (p = 0.04).

conclusionsThe prevalence of BO in SG patients is considerable. The risk of BE increases in patients with poor bariatric outcome. Endoscopic surveillance should be considered as part of the follow-up, especially in patients with higher overall risk of BE.

Indexed as

bariatric proceduresBarrett’s oesophagusendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID34950266
PMCPMC8669983
OpenAlexW3180398753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.