Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34950226›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2021

How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species.

Frédéric Douhard, Mathieu Douhard, Hélène Gilbert, Philippe Monget, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Jean-François Lemaître

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The "fire of life cycles": age-specific metabolic scaling within and among species.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frédéric DouhardGenPhySE INRAE ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet-Tolosan France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8503-1089
Mathieu DouhardLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-7270
Hélène GilbertGenPhySE INRAE ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet-Tolosan France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-3228
Philippe MongetCNRS IFCE INRAE PRC Université de Tours Nouzilly France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-175X
Jean-Michel GaillardLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-8451
Jean-François LemaîtreLaboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9898-2353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trade-offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient-rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade-offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self-maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade-off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade-offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments.

Indexed as

livestock breedingmetabolic ratepleiotropysenescencetrade‐offs

Identifiers

PMID34950226
PMCPMC8674892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.