Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34949934›Full record

ReviewJournal of inflammation research2021

Ixekizumab for Psoriatic Arthritis: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Selection.

John Miller, Abin P Puravath, Ana-Maria Orbai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Severely complicated ear infection in a patient treated with ixekizumab: a case report.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John MillerDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abin P PuravathDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ana-Maria OrbaiDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-8567
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Sample Processing and Immunoassay Research CoreP30AR070254 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, Antony Rosen · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
Multidisciplinary Rheumatology Training ProgramT32AR048522 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, LIVIA A CASCIOLA-ROSEN · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070254NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR048522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIxekizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A and licensed for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. Review objectives were to summarize: 1) ixekizumab safety in people with PsA, 2) ixekizumab efficacy from Phase III randomized controlled trials, and 3) ixekizumab study participant PsA phenotypes.

methodsWe conducted a search in PubMed limited to phase III randomized controlled trials (RCT) and corresponding long-term extension studies where the intervention was treatment with ixekizumab in a population with PsA.

resultsWe identified 17 publications and 13 met inclusion criteria. Injection site reactions (ISR) and allergic reactions occurred in up to 25.3% and 6.2% with ixekizumab and 4.5% and 1.85, respectively, with placebo. ISR occurred in 9.5-10.6% at 24 and 52 weeks with ixekizumab versus 3.2-3.5% with adalimumab (p < 0.01) in biologic-naïve PsA. Serious adverse events at 24 weeks occurred in 8.5% with adalimumab versus 3.5% with ixekizumab (p = 0.02), and at 52 weeks in 12.45 with adalimumab and 4.25 with ixekizumab (p < 0.01). Ixekizumab had similar efficacy to adalimumab across all PsA musculoskeletal, symptom and patient-reported outcome domains and surpassed adalimumab in psoriasis outcomes as well as all combined musculoskeletal and psoriasis outcomes. The study subject population was overwhelmingly white, balanced men-women, BMI at the obese threshold, had on average 7-year PsA duration and 15-year psoriasis duration. Disease activity was high with 7/66 swollen joints, 13/68 tender joints, 55% enthesitis, variable dactylitis (12-51%), and active psoriasis in >92%.

conclusionIxekizumab treatment in PsA was associated with a statistically significant higher risk of injection site reactions versus placebo or adalimumab. Ixekizumab had statistically significantly fewer serious adverse events than adalimumab. Ixekizumab demonstrated efficacy for all PsA disease activity domains as well as for slowing radiographic disease progression. The main shortcoming of the ixekizumab PsA program is lack of representation of African American study participants.

Indexed as

biologic therapyclinical trialsinterleukin-17 inhibitorixekizumabpsoriatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID34949934
PMCPMC8691193
OpenAlexW4200122148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.