ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2022
Interindividual Variability and Differential Tissue Abundance of Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component Enzymes in Humans.
Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- mARC1 Is the Main Contributor to Metabolic Reduction ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Advancing Our Understanding of Pyranopterin-Dithiolene Contributions to Moco Enzyme Catalysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondrial amidoxime-reducing component (mARC) enzymes are molybdenum-containing proteins that metabolize a number of endobiotics and xenobiotics. The interindividual variability and differential tissue abundance of mARC1 and mARC2 were quantified using targeted proteomics in three types of tissue fractions: 1) pediatric liver tissue homogenates, 2) total membrane fraction of the paired liver and kidney samples from pediatric and adult donors, and 3) pooled S9 fractions of the liver, intestine, kidney, lung, and heart. The absolute levels of mARC1 and mARC2 in the pediatric liver homogenate were 40.08 ± 4.26 and 24.58 ± 4.02 pmol/mg homogenate protein, respectively, and were independent of age and sex. In the total membrane fraction of the paired liver and kidney samples, the abundance of hepatic mARC1 and mARC2 was comparable, whereas mARC2 abundance in the kidney was approximately 9-fold higher in comparison with mARC1. The analysis of the third set of samples (i.e., S9 fraction) revealed that mARC1 abundance in the kidney, intestine, and lung was 5- to 13-fold lower than the liver S9 abundance, whereas mARC2 abundance was approximately 3- and 16-fold lower in the intestine and lung than the liver S9, respectively. In contrast, the kidney mARC2 abundance in the S9 fraction was approximately 2.5-fold higher as compared with the hepatic mARC2 abundance. The abundance of mARC enzymes in the heart was below the limit of quantification (∼0.6 pmol/mg protein). The mARC enzyme abundance data presented here can be used to develop physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of in vivo pharmacokinetics of mARC substrates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A precise targeted quantitative proteomics method was developed and applied to quantify newly discovered drug-metabolizing enzymes, mARC1 and mARC2, in pediatric and adult tissue samples. The data suggest that mARC enzymes are ubiquitously expressed in an isoform-specific manner in the human liver, kidney, intestine, and lung, and the enzyme abundance is not associated with age and sex. These data are important for developing physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of in vivo pharmacokinetics of mARC substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.