Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34949629›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Maternal health and Indigenous traditional midwives in southern Mexico: contextualisation of a scoping review.

Iván Sarmiento, Sergio Paredes-Solís, Anna Dion, Hilah Silver, Emily Vargas, Paloma Cruz, Juan Pimentel, Germán Zuluaga, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iván SarmientoDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada ivan.sarmiento@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-1464
Sergio Paredes-SolísCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales - CIET, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3015-3038
Anna DionDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-222X
Hilah SilverDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-6805
Emily VargasUnidad de Posgrados e Investigación, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Merida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4477-4572
Paloma CruzEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan PimentelDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-3064
Germán ZuluagaEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5715-9133
Anne CockcroftDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-1106
Neil AnderssonDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-2136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCollate published evidence of factors that affect maternal health in Indigenous communities and contextualise the findings with stakeholder perspectives in the Mexican State of Guerrero.

designScoping review and stakeholder fuzzy cognitive mapping. INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION: The scoping review included empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods) that addressed maternal health issues among Indigenous communities in the Americas and reported on the role or influence of traditional midwives before June 2020. The contextualisation drew on two previous studies of traditional midwife and researcher perspectives in southern Mexico.

resultsThe initial search identified 4461 references. Of 87 selected studies, 63 came from Guatemala and Mexico. Three small randomised trials involved traditional midwives. One addressed the practice of traditional midwifery. With diverse approaches to cultural differences, the studies used contrasting definitions of traditional midwives. A fuzzy cognitive map graphically summarised the influences identified in the scoping review. When we compared the literature's map with those from 29 traditional midwives in Guerrero and eight international researchers, the three sources coincided in the importance of self-care practices, rituals and traditional midwifery. The primary concern reflected in the scoping review was access to Western healthcare, followed by maternal health outcomes. For traditional midwives, the availability of hospital or health centre in the community was less relevant and had negative effects on other protective influences, while researchers conditioned its importance to its levels of cultural safety. Traditional midwives highlighted the role of violence against women, male involvement and traditional diseases.

conclusionsThe literature and stakeholder maps showed maternal health resulting from complex interacting factors in which promotion of cultural practices was compatible with a protective effect on Indigenous maternal health. Future research challenges include traditional concepts of diseases and the impact on maternal health of gender norms, self-care practices and authentic traditional midwifery.

Indexed as

MidwiferyDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleMaternal HealthMexicoPregnancymaternal medicineprimary carepublic healthsocial medicinestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34949629
PMCPMC8710897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.