Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34949603›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Guided self-determination intervention versus attention control for people with type 2 diabetes in outpatient clinics: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Anne Sophie Mathiesen, Vibeke Zoffmann, Tine Bruhn Skytte, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, Bodil Rasmussen, Emilie Marqvorsen, Thordis Thomsen, Mette Rothmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04601311 (A Digitally Supported Guided Self-determination Intervention Versus Attention Control for People With Type 2 Diabetes in Outpatient Clinics - a Randomised Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04601311 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Digitally Supported Guided Self-determination Intervention Versus Attention Control for People With Type 2 Diabetes in Outpatient Clinics - a Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2020 to 2022Enrolled224ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsGuided self-determination, Personal support in goal-pursuing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Sophie MathiesenDepartment of Endocrinology, Center for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark asmathiesen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-1012
Vibeke ZoffmannThe Research Unit Women's and Children's Health, The Julie Marie Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tine Bruhn SkytteThe Research Unit Women's and Children's Health, The Julie Marie Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janus C JakobsenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christian GluudThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane LindschouThe Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bodil RasmussenSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Emilie MarqvorsenThe Research Unit Women's and Children's Health, The Julie Marie Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thordis ThomsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Mette RothmannDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the management of type 2 diabetes, autonomy-supporting interventions may be a prerequisite to achieving more long-term improvement. Preliminary evidence has shown that the guided self-determination (GSD) method might have an effect on haemoglobin A1c and diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes. Previous trials were at risk of uncertainty. Thus, the objective is to investigate the benefits and harms of a GSD intervention versus an attention control group intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial protocol is guided by the The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for International Trials Statement. We describe the protocol for a pragmatic randomised, dual-centre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial testing a GSD intervention versus an attention control for people with type 2 diabetes in outpatient clinics. The participants (n=224) will be recruited from two diverse regions of Denmark. The experimental stepped-care intervention will consist of three to five GSD sessions lasting up to 1 hour with a trained GSD facilitator. The sessions will be conducted face to face, by video conference or over the telephone. The attention controls will receive three to five sessions lasting up to an hour with a communication-trained healthcare professional provided face to-face, by video conference, or over the telephone. Participants will be included if they have type 2 diabetes,>18 years old, are not pregnant. Participants will be assessed before randomisation, at 5-month, and 12-month follow-up, the latter being the primary. The primary outcome is diabetes distress. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, depressive symptoms and non-serious adverse events. Exploratory outcomes are haemoglobin A1c, motivation and serious adverse events. Data will be collected using REDCap and analysed using Stata V.16. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the Helsinki Declaration in its latest form, International Harmonisation of Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). The trial has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2020-864). The Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark reviewed the trial protocol, but exempted the trial protocol from full review (H-20003638). The results of the trial will be presented at the outpatient clinics treating people with type 2 diabetes, at national and international conferences as well as to associations for people with diabetes and their relatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04601311.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttentionEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlycated Hemoglobinclinical trialseducation & training (see medical education & training)general endocrinology

Identifiers

PMID34949603
PMCPMC8710887
OpenAlexW3126893346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.