Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34949557›Full record

ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2022

Outcomes following lung re-transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Ernest G Chan, Eric J Hyzny, John P Ryan, Matthew R Morrell, Joseph Pilewski, Pablo G Sanchez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lung re-transplantation for recipients with cystic fibrosis: Procedure choice and other considerations.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ernest G ChanDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Eric J HyznyDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
John P RyanDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Matthew R MorrellDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Joseph PilewskiDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Pablo G SanchezDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: sanchezpg@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and compared their clinical status at the time of primary versus double lung re-transplantation (re-DLTx) in order to better understand lung retransplant practice patterns.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database identifying CF patients ≥18 years old undergoing re-DLTx (5/4/2005 and 12/4/2020). Baseline and clinical variables at the primary and re-DLTx were compared utilizing the paired student t-test. Graft survival was defined as time from surgery to retransplant and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

results277 CF patients who underwent re-DLTx experienced a significantly worse 5-year survival when compared to the primary DLTx cohort (47.9% vs 58.8%, p = 0.00012). The following differences were observed comparing CF re-DLTx group to their primary DLTx: higher LAS score at the time of listing (50.66 vs 42.15, p < 0.001) and transplant (62.19 vs 48.20, p < 0.001), and increase LAS from the time of listing to transplant (+12.22 vs +7.23, p = 0.002). While serum albumin and total bilirubin were similar, CF patients had a higher creatinine (1.05 vs 0.74, p < 0.001), dialysis (4.4% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001), ECMO bridge to transplant rates (7.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.001), and higher oxygen requirements (5.95 vs 3.93, p < 0.001) at the time of listing for a re-DLTx.

conclusionCompared to their initial transplant, CF patients experience significant clinical decline in renal, cardiac, and pulmonary function at the time of lung retransplantation. This may indicate that an earlier evaluation and rehabilitation process may be necessary to identify patients earlier for lung retransplantation prior significant clinical decline.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisLung TransplantationAdolescentCohort StudiesHumansLungRetrospective StudiesLung allocationLung retransplantationLung retransplantation in the cystic fibrosis populationLung transplant evaluationPrimary double lung transplantation

Identifiers

PMID34949557
OpenAlexW4200347542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.