ReviewClinical breast cancer2022
Genomic Characterization of De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Review in Clinical breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endocrine therapy resistance of breast cancer: Important role of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and new therapeutic strategies.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Sacituzumab govitecan in the first-line treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: balancing therapeutic sequencing with patient-relevant benefits.The oncologist · 2025Article
- MRPL24 drives breast cancer metastasis and stemness by targeting c-MYC, BRD4, and STAT3.3 Biotech · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a minority of MBC cases, and as such, its genomics are poorly understood. Characterizing the genomics of dnMBC represents an opportunity to delineate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. In this review, we first summarize the literature of the genomics of MBC which showed that MBCs have greater mutational burden than early stage, treatment naïve breast cancers. We then turn to recent studies that have sought to focus on dnMBC. We propose that understanding genomic differences between dnMBC and relapsed MBC can inform treatment choices. Finally, we discuss translational strategies to better dissect the genomics of dnMBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.