Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34949496›Full record

SynthesisVaccine2022

The half-life of maternal transplacental antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis in infants: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Blanché Oguti, Asad Ali, Nick Andrews, Daan Barug, Duc Anh Dang, Scott A Halperin, Ha Thi Thu Hoang, Beth Holder, Beate Kampmann, Abdul M Kazi and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Vaccination in pregnancy to protect the newborn.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.

Blanché OgutiOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Asad AliAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nick AndrewsPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Daan BarugCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands.
Duc Anh DangNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Vietnam.
Scott A HalperinCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Ha Thi Thu HoangNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Vietnam.
Beth HolderDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Beate KampmannLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Abdul M KaziAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Joanne M LangleyCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Elke LeuridanCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Naomi MadavanUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Kirsten MaertensCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Herberth MaldonadoUniversidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala.
Elizabeth MillerPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Flor M Munoz-RivasBaylor College of Medicine, USA.
Saad B OmerYale Institute for Global Health, USA.
Andrew J PollardOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas F RiceDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Nynke RotsCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands.
Maria E SundaramCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, USA.
Nasamon WanlapakornCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
Merryn VoyseyOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: merryn.voysey@paediatrics.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBAga Khan University · PKCanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAImperial College London · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLNational Institute Of Hygiene And Epidemiology · VNPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Antwerp · BEBaylor College of Medicine · USChulalongkorn University · THLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMarshfield Clinic · USUniversidad del Valle de Guatemala · GTUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Training a New Generation of VaccinologistsT32AI074492 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Rama Rao Amara, Benjamin A Lopman · 2009 to 2026
$6.4M
Effects of Maternal Influenza Immunization: A Field Trial in Guatemala'R34AI091437 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OMER, SAAD B. · 2010 to 2010
$230k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNIAID NIH HHS R34 AI091437NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThere are few reliable estimates of the half-lives of maternal antibodies to the antigens found in the primary series vaccines. We aimed to calculate the half-lives of passively acquired diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) antibodies in infants. We aimed to determine whether decay rates varied according to country, maternal age, gestational age, birthweight, World Bank income classifications, or vaccine received by the mother during pregnancy.

methodsDe-identified data from infants born to women taking part in 10 studies, in 9 countries (UK, Belgium, Thailand, Vietnam, Canada, Pakistan, USA, Guatemala and the Netherlands) were combined in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Blood samples were taken at two timepoints before any DTP-containing vaccines were received by the infant: at birth and at 2-months of age. Decay rates for each antigen were log

resultsData from 1426 mother-infant pairs were included in the analysis. The half-lives of the 6 antigen-specific maternal antibodies of interest were similar, with point estimates ranging from 28.7 (95% CI: 24.4 - 35) days for tetanus toxoid antibodies to 35.1 (95% CI: 30.7 - 41.1) days for pertactin antibodies. The decay of maternal antibodies did not significantly differ by maternal age, gestational age, birthweight, maternal vaccination status or type of vaccine administered.

conclusionMaternal antibodies decay at different rates for the different antigens; however, the magnitude of the difference is small. Decay rates are not modified by key demographic or vaccine characteristics.

Indexed as

DiphtheriaTetanusWhooping CoughAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineFemaleHalf-LifeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyTetanus ToxoidAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineTetanus Toxoid

Identifiers

PMID34949496
PMCPMC9664482
OpenAlexW4200536663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.