ArticleBMC ophthalmology2021
Study on the enlargement index of femtosecond laser-assisted capsulorhexis in 2-6-year-old patients with congenital cataract.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deviation between programmed and actual capsulotomy diameter in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a clinical study of influencing factors and predictive modeling.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Prospective Case Series of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Insights and decision-making on surgical triggers of glaucoma-related complications in congenital cataract surgery: a clinical review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Multiple linear regression model for improving accuracy of capsulorhexis size calculation in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for adults: a retrospective single-center study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Capsulotomy enlargement after femtosecond laser treatment among cataract patients of different age groups: a retrospective case series.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Update and perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy in children undergoing cataract surgery: a large case series.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo identify the capsule enlargement index after femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulorhexis in 2-6-year-old children who underwent congenital cataract surgery.
methodsIn this prospective case series study, femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulorhexis was performed in patients with congenital cataract, aged 2-6 years. The actual achieved capsulorhexis diameters were measured with Digimizer version 4.2.6. Correlation coefficient (r) and multiple linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the variables that could potentially influence anterior capsulorhexis enlargement index (E).
resultsThis prospective study enrolled 28 eyes of 22 patients with congenital cataract. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 4.67 years ±1.54 (standard deviation [SD]). "E" of the 28 cases was 1.211 ± 0.039 (SD). Correlation analysis showed that "E" correlated significantly with the anterior chamber depth (ACD) (r = - 0.469, p = 0.021) and axial length (AL) (r = 0.452, p = 0.027). The following formula was developed by using multivariable linear regression analysis: Predicted E = 1.177-0.052 × ACD + 0.009 × AL, R
conclusionsThe anterior capsulorhexis enlargement index and its calculation formula could help to set up an accurate programmed capsulorhexis diameter for femtosecond laser-assisted congenital cataract surgery in children aged 2-6 years. Thus, an appropriate actual capsulorhexis diameter could be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.