Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948997›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Public Perceptions around mHealth Applications during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Network and Sentiment Analysis of Tweets in Saudi Arabia.

Samar Binkheder, Raniah N Aldekhyyel, Alanoud AlMogbel, Nora Al-Twairesh, Nuha Alhumaid, Shahad N Aldekhyyel, Amr A Jamal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samar BinkhederMedical Informatics and E-learning Unit, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0400-823X
Raniah N AldekhyyelMedical Informatics and E-learning Unit, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6358-6617
Alanoud AlMogbelFreelance Research Assistant, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.
Nora Al-TwaireshInformation Technology Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-4956
Nuha AlhumaidCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad N AldekhyyelCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia.
Amr A JamalEvidence-Based Health Care & Knowledge Translation Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-6592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of mitigation efforts were implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia, including the development of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for the public. Assessing the acceptability of mHealth apps among the public is crucial. This study aimed to use Twitter to understand public perceptions around the use of six Saudi mHealth apps used during COVID-19: "Sehha", "Mawid", "Sehhaty", "Tetamman", "Tawakkalna", and "Tabaud". We used two methodological approaches: network and sentiment analysis. We retrieved Twitter data using specific mHealth apps-related keywords. After including relevant tweets, our final mHealth app networks consisted of a total of 4995 Twitter users and 8666 conversational relationships. The largest networks in size (i.e., the number of users) and volume (i.e., the conversational relationships) among all were "Tawakkalna" followed by "Tabaud", and their conversations were led by diverse governmental accounts. In contrast, the four remaining mHealth networks were mainly led by the health sector and media. Our sentiment analysis approach included five classes and showed that most conversations were neutral, which included facts or information pieces and general inquires. For the automated sentiment classifier, we used Support Vector Machine with AraVec embeddings as it outperformed the other tested classifiers. The sentiment classifier showed an accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 85%. Future studies can use social media and real-time analytics to improve mHealth apps' services and user experience, especially during health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaTelemedicineHumansPandemicsPublic OpinionSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaSentiment AnalysiscoronavirusCOVID-19health informaticsmHealth applicationsnetwork analysispublic healthsentiment analysissocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID34948997
PMCPMC8708161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.