Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948926›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Dietary Intake, Cost, and Affordability by Socioeconomic Group in Australia.

Meron Lewis, Sarah A McNaughton, Lucie Rychetnik, Mark D Chatfield, Amanda J Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diet Cost and Affordability in Queensland: A Two-Year Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Where Cost of Food Hits Hardest: Investigation of Diet Cost and Affordability in a Low Socioeconomic Region of Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Sustainability and cost of typical and heart-healthy dietary patterns in Australia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meron LewisSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2163-0848
Sarah A McNaughtonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5936-9820
Lucie RychetnikThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Glebe 2037, Australia.
Mark D ChatfieldSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.
Amanda J LeeSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-5426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few Australians consume diets consistent with the Australian Dietary Guidelines. A major problem is high intake of discretionary food and drinks (those not needed for health and high in saturated fat, added sugar, salt and/or alcohol). Low socioeconomic groups (SEGs) suffer particularly poor diet-related health. Surprisingly, detailed quantitative dietary data across SEGs was lacking. Analysis of the most recent national nutrition survey data produced habitual intakes of a reference household (two adults and two children) in SEG quintiles of household income. Cost and affordability of habitual and recommended diets for the reference household were determined using methods based on the Healthy Diets Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing protocol. Low SEGs reported significantly lower intakes of healthy food and drinks yet similarly high intakes of discretionary choices to high SEGs (435 serves/fortnight). Total habitual diets of low SEGs cost significantly less than those of high SEGs (AU$751/fortnight to AU$853/fortnight). Results confirmed low SEGs cannot afford a healthy diet. Lower intakes of healthy choices in low SEGs may help explain their higher rates of diet-related disease compared to higher SEGs. The findings can inform potential policy actions to improve affordability of healthy foods and help drive healthier diets for all Australians.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyNutrition PolicyAdultAustraliaChildCosts and Cost AnalysisDietEatingEnergy IntakeHumansSocioeconomic FactorsAustraliadiet affordabilitydietary intakediet costlow socioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID34948926
PMCPMC8703846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.