Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948906›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Using GIS to Estimate Population at Risk Because of Residence Proximity to Asbestos Processing Facilities in Colombia.

Benjamin Lysaniuk, María Fernanda Cely-García, Margarita Giraldo, Joan M Larrahondo, Laura Marcela Serrano-Calderón, Juan Carlos Guerrero-Bernal, Leonardo Briceno-Ayala, Esteban Cruz Rodriguez, Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin LysaniukIRD (MàD by CNRS)-UMR Prodig, 93222 Aubervilliers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-7338
María Fernanda Cely-GarcíaDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0357-0300
Margarita GiraldoDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.
Joan M LarrahondoDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3681-3383
Laura Marcela Serrano-CalderónDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia.
Juan Carlos Guerrero-BernalFacultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos (FEIPU), Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.
Leonardo Briceno-AyalaEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4452-3818
Esteban Cruz RodriguezFacultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos (FEIPU), Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.
Juan Pablo Ramos-BonillaDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent enactment of the law banning asbestos in Colombia raises a significant number of challenges. The largest factories that have historically processed asbestos include five asbestos-cement facilities located in the cities of Sibaté (Cundinamarca), Cali (Valle del Cauca), and Barranquilla (Atlántico), and Manizales (Caldas), which has two, as well as a friction products facility in Bogotá D.C. An asbestos chrysotile mine has also operated in Colombia since 1980 in Campamento (Antioquia). In the framework of developing the National Asbestos Profile for Colombia, in this study, we estimated the population residing in the vicinity of asbestos processing plants or the mine and, therefore, potentially at risk of disease. Using a geographic information system, demographic data obtained from the last two general population censuses were processed to determine the number of people living within the concentric circles surrounding the asbestos facilities and the mine. In previous studies conducted in different countries of the world, an increased risk of asbestos-related diseases has been reported for people living at different distance bands from asbestos processing facilities. Based on these studies, circles of 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, and 10,000 m radii, centered on the asbestos processing facilities and the mine that operated in Colombia, were combined with the census data to estimate the number of people living within these radii. Large numbers of people were identified. It is estimated that in 2005, at the country level, 10,489 people lived within 500 m of an asbestos processing facility or mine. In 2018, and within a distance of 10,000 m, the number of people was 6,724,677. This information can aid public health surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

AsbestosMesotheliomaAsbestos, SerpentineColombiaGeographic Information SystemsHumansRisk FactorsAsbestosAsbestos, SerpentineasbestosColombiaenvironmental exposuregeographic information systempopulation

Identifiers

PMID34948906
PMCPMC8703708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.