Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948896›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development of a Personal Ultrasound Exposimeter for Occupational Health Monitoring.

Michal Cieslak, Christoph Kling, Andrea Wolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal CieslakPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7336-0360
Christoph KlingPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-5199
Andrea WolffInstitut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA der DGUV), 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-0058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to airborne ultrasound in a workplace can have a detrimental influence on a worker's well-being. Given the ever-increasing use of ultrasonic industrial equipment, it is of vital importance-and may also be regulated by law-to monitor ultrasound exposure during a normal workday as part of workplace risk assessment. However, the devices currently utilized exhibit limitations with regard to both their operational frequency and their portability (wearability). In this paper, the first prototype of a high-frequency and ultrasound personal exposimeter is presented in the light of the latest national and international standards governing high-frequency and ultrasonic noise measurement in the field of occupational health monitoring. The prototype was tested in the laboratory environment in order to assess its sound level detection capabilities in both the audible and ultrasonic frequency ranges. Several common industrial scenarios-including an ultrasonic welding machine, an ultrasonic cleaning bath, and a compressed air gun-were simulated in a laboratory environment. For each simulated set-up, a corresponding high-frequency or ultrasonic signal was fed through a specially prepared generation chain. Each experimental scenario was initially surveyed with an ultrasound level meter previously tested up to 100 kHz. This was followed by a measurement with the prototype. For this study, the simulated sound signals varied between 10 kHz and 40 kHz on the frequency scale and between 60 dB and 90 dB in amplitude. The portability of the prototype, which may be required to be worn throughout an entire workday (e.g., 8 h), was also considered. All the experiments were performed on a customized ultrasound measurement set-up within a free-field environment located at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig, Germany. Results obtained suggest a good agreement between the measurements performed with both devices in the louder areas of the sound fields produced. Because the overall measurement uncertainty is highly dependent on the specificity of the individual measurement set-up and measurement procedure, an uncertainty budget estimated for the prototype considers electro-acoustical contributions only.

Indexed as

Noise, OccupationalOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthNoisePressureUltrasonicsWorkplaceoccupational healthpersonal sound exposimetersound level measurementultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34948896
PMCPMC8701391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.