Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948722›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Validity and Reliability of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale in the Czech Republic (CRBS-CZE): Determination of Key Barriers in East-Central Europe.

Petr Winnige, Katerina Filakova, Jakub Hnatiak, Filip Dosbaba, Otakar Bocek, Garyfallia Pepera, Jannis Papathanasiou, Ladislav Batalik, Sherry L Grace

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Petr WinnigeDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Katerina FilakovaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jakub HnatiakDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Filip DosbabaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Otakar BocekDepartment of Internal Cardiology Medicine, University Hospital Brno, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Garyfallia PeperaPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35100 Lamia, Greece.
Jannis PapathanasiouDepartment of Medical Imaging, Allergology & Physiotherapy, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-2557-5508
Ladislav BatalikDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2147-1541
Sherry L GraceFaculty of Health, York University & KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7063-3610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) is an effective secondary preventive model of care. However, the use of CR is insufficient, and the reasons for this are not well-characterized in East-Central Europe. This prospective observational study psychometrically validated the recently translated Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale for the Czech language (CRBS-CZE) and identified the main CR barriers. Consecutive cardiac in/out-patients were approached from January 2020 for 18 months, of whom 186 (89.9%) consented. In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, participants completed the 21-item CRBS-CZE (response options 1-5, with higher scores representing greater barriers), and their CR utilization was tracked. Forty-five (24.2%) participants enrolled in CR, of whom 42 completed the CRBS a second time thereafter. Factor analysis revealed four factors, consistent with other CRBS translations. Internal reliability was acceptable for all but one factor (Cronbach's alpha range = 0.44-0.77). Mean total barrier scores were significantly higher in non-enrollers (

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCOVID-19Czech RepublicEuropeHumansPandemicsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesbarrierscardiac rehabilitationcoronary artery diseaseCzech Republicutilization

Identifiers

PMID34948722
PMCPMC8701715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.