Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948707›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Identification of Policies Based on Assessment-Optimization Model to Confront Vulnerable Resources System with Large Population Scale in a Big City.

Xueting Zeng, Hua Xiang, Jia Liu, Yong Xue, Jinxin Zhu, Yuqian Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xueting ZengSchool of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100072, China.
Hua XiangSchool of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100072, China.
Jia LiuCollege of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100072, China.
Yong XueSchool of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100072, China.
Jinxin ZhuSchool of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Yuqian XuHenry M. Gunn High School, Capital University of Economics and Business, 780 Arastradero Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conflict between excessive population development and vulnerable resource (including water, food, and energy resources) capacity influenced by multiple uncertainties can increase the difficulty of decision making in a big city with large population scale. In this study, an adaptive population and water-food-energy (WFE) management framework (APRF) incorporating vulnerability assessment, uncertainty analysis, and systemic optimization methods is developed for optimizing the relationship between population development and WFE management (P-WFE) under combined policies. In the APRF, the vulnerability of WFE was calculated by an entropy-based driver-pressure-state-response (E-DPSR) model to reflect the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability caused by population growth, economic development, and resource governance. Meanwhile, a scenario-based dynamic fuzzy model with Hurwicz criterion (SDFH) is proposed for not only optimizing the relationship of P-WFE with uncertain information expressed as possibility and probability distributions, but also reflecting the risk preference of policymakers with an elected manner. The developed APRF is applied to a real case study of Beijing city, which has characteristics of a large population scale and resource deficit. The results of WFE shortages and population adjustments were obtained to identify an optimized P-WEF plan under various policies, to support the adjustment of the current policy in Beijing city. Meanwhile, the results associated with resource vulnerability and benefit analysis were analyzed for improving the robustness of policy generation.

Indexed as

PolicyWater ResourcesCitiesModels, TheoreticalProbabilityUncertaintypolicy scenario analysispopulation–resource management frameworktwo-stage dynamic fuzzy programming with Hurwicz criterionvulnerability assessment

Identifiers

PMID34948707
PMCPMC8701058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.