Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948693›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Qualitative Exploration of the 'Rolling Unmasking Effect' for Downwind Odor Dispersion from a Model Animal Source.

Donald W Wright, Jacek A Koziel, David B Parker, Anna Iwasinska, Thomas G Hartman, Paula Kolvig, Landon Wahe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Effect of a Synthetic Scent on Cheetah Behaviour.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Donald W WrightDon Wright & Associates, LLC, Georgetown, TX 78628, USA.
Jacek A KozielDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-0354
David B ParkerCollege of Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016, USA.
Anna IwasinskaVolatile Analysis Corporation Inc., Grant, AL 78664, USA.
Thomas G HartmanDepartment of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Paula KolvigMoody Gardens, Galveston, TX 77554, USA.
Landon WaheDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-9121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solving environmental odor issues can be confounded by many analytical, technological, and socioeconomic factors. Considerable know-how and technologies can fail to properly identify odorants responsible for the downwind nuisance odor and, thereby, focus on odor mitigation strategies. We propose enabling solutions to environmental odor issues utilizing troubleshooting techniques developed for the food, beverage, and consumer products industries. Our research has shown that the odorant impact-priority ranking process can be definable and relatively simple. The initial challenge is the prioritization of environmental odor character from the perspective of the impacted citizenry downwind. In this research, we utilize a natural model from the animal world to illustrate the rolling unmasking effect (RUE) and discuss it more systematically in the context of the proposed environmental odorant prioritization process. Regardless of the size and reach of an odor source, a simplification of odor character and composition typically develops with increasing dilution downwind. An extreme odor simplification-upon-dilution was demonstrated for the prehensile-tailed porcupine (P.T. porcupine); its downwind odor frontal boundary was dominated by a pair of extremely potent character-defining odorants: (1) 'onion'/'body odor' and (2) 'onion'/'grilled' odorants. In contrast with the outer-boundary simplicity, the near-source assessment presented considerable compositional complexity and composite odor character difference. The ultimate significance of the proposed RUE approach is the illustration of naturally occurring phenomena that explain why some environmental odors and their sources can be challenging to identify and mitigate using an analytical-only approach (focused on compound identities and concentrations). These approaches rarely move beyond comprehensive lists of volatile compounds emitted by the source. The novelty proposed herein lies in identification of those few compounds responsible for the downwind odor impacts and requiring mitigation focus.

Indexed as

Body OdorOdorantsAnimalsIndustryair samplingenvironmental analysisodorprairie verbenaprehensile-tailed porcupinesimultaneous chemical and sensory analysisVirginia pepperweedvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID34948693
PMCPMC8702010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.