ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Sagittal Cervical Spine Alignment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The correlation between loss of cervical lordosis and the severity of ligament ossification in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a cross-sectional observational study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Finite element analysis of the effects of different ossification types and spinal canal occupancy rates on dynamic spinal cord stress in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Radiography with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Measurement of Cervical Lordosis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Capturing the cervical spine shape: Angular measurements versus geometric morphometric methods.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Cervical sagittal balance after consecutive three-level hybrid surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results from a single-center experience.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Upper and lower cervical alignment parameters measured on supine magnetic resonance imaging with the occipital slope as a key marker of cervical alignment.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Although radiography performed on the subject in an upright position is considered the standard method for assessing sagittal cervical alignment, it is frequently determined, or reported, based on MRI performed on the subject in a supine position. (2) Methods: Cervical alignment observed in both imaging modalities was assessed using four methods: the C2-7 Cobb angle, the absolute rotation angle (ARA), Borden's method, and the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Cervical alignment was determined (lordosis, kyphosis, and straight) based on radiography. Then, the diagnostic cut-off values for the MRI images and their corresponding diagnostic accuracies were assessed. (3) Results: The analysis included 142 outpatients. The determined diagnostic cut-off values for lordosis, using three measurements (Cobb angle, ARA, and Borden's method), were -8.5°, -12.5°, and 3.5 mm, respectively, and the cut-off values for kyphosis were -4.5°, 0.5°, and -1.5 mm, respectively. The cut-off value for SVA > 40 mm was 19.5 mm. The Cobb angle, ARA, and Borden's method, on MRI, showed high negative predictive values for determining kyphosis. The SVA on MRI measurements also showed high negative predictive values for determining >40 mm. (4) Conclusions: MRI measurements may be predictive of cervical alignment, especially for the exclusion of kyphosis and SVA > 40 mm. However, caution is needed in the other determinations using MRI, as their accuracies are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.