Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948598›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

HBM4EU Occupational Biomonitoring Study on e-Waste-Study Protocol.

Paul T J Scheepers, Radu Corneliu Duca, Karen S Galea, Lode Godderis, Emilie Hardy, Lisbeth E Knudsen, Elizabeth Leese, Henriqueta Louro, Selma Mahiout, Sophie Ndaw and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of mTOR signaling in regulating the quality of mammalian oocytes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Paul T J ScheepersRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8546-2161
Radu Corneliu DucaDepartment of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 1 rue Louis Rech, 3555 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-9350-3816
Karen S GaleaInstitute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-8513
Lode GodderisCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8835
Emilie HardyDepartment of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), 1 rue Louis Rech, 3555 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Lisbeth E KnudsenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-1202
Elizabeth LeeseHealth & Safety Executive, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK.
Henriqueta LouroINSA, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Department of Human Genetics, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-609 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-7332
Selma MahioutFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 b, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-1155
Sophie NdawINRS, French National Research and Safety Institute, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-2465
Katrien PoelsCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-6831
Simo P PorrasFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 b, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Maria J SilvaINSA, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Department of Human Genetics, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-609 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6060-0716
Ana Maria TavaresINSA, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Department of Human Genetics, Av. Padre Cruz, 1600-609 Lisbon, Portugal.
Jelle VerdonckCentre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4105-5126
Susana ViegasNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1015-8760
Tiina SantonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 b, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Hbm Eu E-Waste Study Team
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIKU Leuven · BENational Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PTLaboratoire National de Santé · LUHSE Science and Research Centre · GBInstitute of Occupational Medicine · GBInstitut National de Recherche et de Sécurité · FRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers involved in the processing of electronic waste (e-waste) are potentially exposed to toxic chemicals. If exposure occurs, this may result in uptake and potential adverse health effects. Thus, exposure surveillance is an important requirement for health risk management and prevention of occupational disease. Human biomonitoring by measurement of specific biomarkers in body fluids is considered as an effective method of exposure surveillance. The aim of this study is to investigate the internal exposure of workers processing e-waste using a human biomonitoring approach, which will stimulate improved work practices and contribute to raising awareness of potential hazards. This exploratory study in occupational exposures in e-waste processing is part of the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU). Here we present a study protocol using a cross sectional survey design to study worker's exposures and compare these to the exposure of subjects preferably employed in the same company but with no known exposure to industrial recycling of e-waste. The present study protocol will be applied in six to eight European countries to ensure standardised data collection. The target population size is 300 exposed and 150 controls. Biomarkers of exposure for the following chemicals will be used: chromium, cadmium and lead in blood and urine; brominated flame retardants and polychlorobiphenyls in blood; mercury, organophosphate flame retardants and phthalates in urine, and chromium, cadmium, lead and mercury in hair. In addition, the following effect biomarkers will be studied: micronuclei, epigenetic, oxidative stress, inflammatory markers and telomere length in blood and metabolomics in urine. Occupational hygiene sampling methods (airborne and settled dust, silicon wristbands and handwipes) and contextual information will be collected to facilitate the interpretation of the biomarker results and discuss exposure mitigating interventions to further reduce exposures if needed. This study protocol can be adapted to future European-wide occupational studies.

Indexed as

Electronic WasteOccupational ExposureBiological MonitoringCross-Sectional StudiesDustEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRecyclingDustbiomarkerscadmiumchromiumflame retardantsleadmercuryoccupational exposurephthalatesrecycling

Identifiers

PMID34948598
PMCPMC8701897
OpenAlexW4200451960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.