Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948587›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Which Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions Reduce Inequalities in Common Mental Health Disorders? A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.

Louise Tanner, Sarah Sowden, Madeleine Still, Katie Thomson, Clare Bambra, Josephine Wildman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise TannerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
Sarah SowdenPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-3463
Madeleine StillPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-6325
Katie ThomsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9614-728X
Clare BambraPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.
Josephine WildmanPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common mental health disorders (CMDs) represent a major public health concern and are particularly prevalent in people experiencing disadvantage or marginalisation. Primary care is the first point of contact for people with CMDs. Pharmaceutical interventions, such as antidepressants, are commonly used in the treatment of CMDs; however, there is concern that these treatments are over-prescribed and ineffective for treating mental distress related to social conditions. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions, such as psychological therapies and "social prescribing", provide alternatives for CMDs. Little is known, however, about which such interventions reduce social inequalities in CMD-related outcomes, and which may, unintentionally, increase them. The aim of this protocol (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021281166) is to describe how we will undertake a systematic review to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions on CMD-related outcomes and social inequalities. A systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods primary studies will be undertaken and reported according to the PRISMA-Equity guidance. The following databases will be searched: Assia, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Scopus. Retrieved records will be screened according to pre-defined eligibility criteria and synthesised using a narrative approach, with meta-analysis if feasible. The findings of this review will guide efforts to commission more equitable mental health services.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topichealthcare disparitieshealth inequalitiesmental disordersprimary health carePROGRESS-Plussystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34948587
PMCPMC8701146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.