Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948572›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Data Regarding Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation with a Long-Term Follow-Up.

Michele Di Cosola, Andrea Ballini, Khrystyna Zhurakivska, Alberto Ceccarello, Riccardo Nocini, Annarita Malcangi, Giorgio Mori, Lorenzo Lo Muzio, Stefania Cantore, Antonio Olivo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. When recreation turns risky: the multifaceted negative impact of cocaine-induced nasal septal perforations.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michele Di CosolaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Andrea BalliniSchool of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8758-1415
Khrystyna ZhurakivskaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2153-0778
Alberto CeccarelloMedical Center Padova, Private Practice, 3513 Padova, Italy.
Riccardo NociniSection of Ear Nose and Throat (ENT), Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatric, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Annarita MalcangiPublic Local Health Company (Azienda Sanitaria Locale, ASL), B.A.T, 76125 Trani, Italy.
Giorgio MoriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6731-0247
Lorenzo Lo MuzioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4633-4893
Stefania CantoreFaculty of Dentistry (Fakulteti i Mjekësisë Dentare-FMD), University of Medicine, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-2521
Antonio OlivoMedical Center Padova, Private Practice, 3513 Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZygomatic implants have been introduced to rehabilitate edentulous patients with severely atrophic maxillae. Their use has been reported by several studies, describing high overall survival rates at medium-long follow-up. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze if a few patient-related and implant-related features are correlated with implant success or the onset of complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsData of patients treated with zygomatic implants between May 2005 and November 2012 at three private clinics were collected and retrospectively analyzed. For each implant, the following data were collected: implant length, insertion path, ridge atrophy and sinus characteristics (width, pneumatization, thickness of mucosae, patency of sinus ostium). General patient characteristics and health status data were also recorded. The outcomes evaluated were implant failure, infective complications, early neurologic complications and overall complications.

resultsA total of 33 patients (14 men, 17 women, mean age 59.1) that received 67 zygomatic implants were included in the study. The mean duration of the follow-up was of 141.6 months (min 109; max 198). In this period, a total of 16 (23.88%) implants in 8 (24.24%) patients were removed and 17 (51.51%) patients with 36 (53.73%) implants reported complications. Immediate loading resulted in a significantly lower risk of complications compared with the two-stage prosthetic rehabilitation (OR: 0.04,

conclusionszygomatic implants are an alternative procedure for atrophic ridge rehabilitation when a conventional implant placement is not possible. Several clinical and anatomical factors can have a significant role in complication occurrence.

Indexed as

Jaw, EdentulousZygomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeimplant failureoral and maxillo-facial surgerysuccess ratezygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID34948572
PMCPMC8701901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.