Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Evaluation of Spanish Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Accountability and Wellbeing Results.

José Antonio Peña-Ramos, Fátima Recuero-López, Antonio Sánchez-Bayón, Francisco Javier Sastre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Activities Carried Out during the First COVID-19 Lockdown by Italian Citizens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Measuring the Impact of Future Outbreaks? A Secondary Analysis of Routinely Available Data in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

José Antonio Peña-RamosFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7073-9562
Fátima Recuero-LópezFaculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, Universidad of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7531-6817
Antonio Sánchez-BayónDepartment of Business Economics (ADO), Applied Economics II and Fundamentals of Economic Analysis, Legal and Social Sciences School, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28033 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-8356
Francisco Javier SastreESIC Business & Marketing School, 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESESIC Business & Marketing SchoolUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a challenge for health systems. For this reason, it is essential to evaluate the management of health systems in the face of the pandemic, identifying the factors that may contribute to its failure or success. This management is more difficult in decentralized countries, since in them, health competencies are distributed among different levels of government. This is the case in Spain, one of the countries most affected by the pandemic. Therefore, the aim of this article is to evaluate how the Spanish health system has managed the COVID-19 pandemic. Four factors related to health management are analyzed: transparency, communication, reputation and well-being generated. For this purpose, a quantitative analysis is used with the contrast of secondary sources, such as the Merco rankings or survey data from the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Sociological Research Center). The results show that although the flow of communication about the health system increases considerably, such information comes mainly from the media, with a deficit in the transparency of health management. Likewise, although the reputation of the health system increases at the beginning of the pandemic, as it progresses, there is a deterioration in citizen satisfaction with the healthcare management and the services provided, as well as in the well-being generated by them. This study may have implications for decision making by public authorities regarding the different factors of health management.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsGovernmentHumansSARS-CoV-2Social ResponsibilitycommunicationCOVID-19health managementhealth systemreputationSpaintransparencywell-being

Identifiers

PMID34948518
PMCPMC8701968
OpenAlexW4200173721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.