Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Three Component Composite Scaffolds Based on PCL, Hydroxyapatite, and L-Lysine Obtained in TIPS-SL: Bioactive Material for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Aleksandra Korbut, Marcin Włodarczyk, Karolina Rudnicka, Aleksandra Szwed, Przemysław Płociński, Monika Biernat, Paulina Tymowicz-Grzyb, Martyna Michalska, Natalia Karska, Sylwia Rodziewicz-Motowidło and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aleksandra KorbutDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology (WUST), Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.
Marcin WłodarczykDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3323-7093
Karolina RudnickaDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-9000
Aleksandra SzwedDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0850-7204
Przemysław PłocińskiDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6623-3494
Monika BiernatBiomaterials Research Group, Ceramic and Concrete Division in Warsaw, Łukasiewicz Research Network Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Postępu 9, 02-676 Warsaw, Poland.
Paulina Tymowicz-GrzybBiomaterials Research Group, Ceramic and Concrete Division in Warsaw, Łukasiewicz Research Network Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Postępu 9, 02-676 Warsaw, Poland.
Martyna MichalskaDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology (WUST), Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.
Natalia KarskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.
Sylwia Rodziewicz-MotowidłoFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-5951
Konrad SzustakiewiczDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology (WUST), Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2855-852X

Funding

Foundation for Polish Science POIR.04.04.00-00-16D7/18-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this research, we describe the properties of three-component composite foam scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) as a matrix and hydroxyapatite whiskers (HAP) and L-Lysine as fillers (PCL/HAP/Lys with wt% ratio 50/48/2). The scaffolds were prepared using a thermally induced phase separation technique supported by salt leaching (TIPS-SL). All materials were precisely characterized: porosity, density, water uptake, wettability, DSC, and TGA measurements and compression tests were carried out. The microstructure of the obtained scaffolds was analyzed via SEM. It was found that the PCL/HAP/Lys scaffold has a 45% higher Young's modulus and better wettability compared to the PCL/HAP system. At the same time, the porosity of the system was ~90%. The osteoblast hFOB 1.19 cell response was also investigated in osteogenic conditions (39 °C) and the cytokine release profile of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α was determined. Modification of PCL scaffolds with HAP and L-Lysine significantly improved the proliferation of pre-osteoblasts cultured on such materials.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCell AdhesionCell LineCell ProliferationDurapatiteHumansLysineOsteoblastsPolyestersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteLysinepolycaprolactonePolyesterscell adhesionfoam scaffoldsL-LysinePCLpolymers

Identifiers

PMID34948389
PMCPMC8707467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.