Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948335›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Evaluation of the Skin-Sensitizing Potential of Brazilian Green Propolis.

Erina Shiraishi, Keishi Ishida, Daisuke Matsumaru, Akiko Ido, Youhei Hiromori, Hisamitsu Nagase, Tsuyoshi Nakanishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cell therapy for age-related macular degeneration.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erina ShiraishiLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.
Keishi IshidaLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-9215
Daisuke MatsumaruLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1832-624X
Akiko IdoLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.
Youhei HiromoriLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.
Hisamitsu NagaseLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.
Tsuyoshi NakanishiLaboratory of Hygienic Chemistry and Molecular Toxicology, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, 1-25-4 Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Gifu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2683-0075
Gifu Pharmaceutical University · JPSuzuka University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows JP18J23393Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18H03381the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan 21KD1004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propolis is a resinous mixture produced by bees from their secretions and plant material, so its composition varies depending on its botanical origin. Propolis has several beneficial bioactivities, but its skin sensitization properties have long been suspected. Nevertheless, the skin sensitization potency of Brazilian green propolis (BGP) has not been scientifically evaluated. Here, we used scientifically reliable tests to evaluate it. In vitro antigenicity test based on the human cell line activation test (OECD TG 442E) was performed by measuring the expression of CD54 and CD86, which are indicators of the antigenicity of test substances, on THP-1 and DC2.4 cells. BGP did not affect the expression of either marker on THP-1 cells, but upregulated the expression of CD86 on DC2.4 cells, suggesting that BGP may be a skin sensitizer. Then, we performed local lymph node assay (LLNA, OECD TG 429) as a definitive in vivo test. LLNA showed that 1.70% BGP primed skin sensitization and is a "moderate sensitizer". Our results indicate scientific proof of the validity of arbitrary concentrations (1-2%), which have been used empirically, and provide the first scientific information on the safe use of BGP.

Indexed as

AllergensDermatitis, Allergic ContactAnimalsBrazilCell LineFemaleHumansLocal Lymph Node AssayMicePropolisSkinTHP-1 CellsAllergensPropoliscontact dermatitisDC2.4 cellshuman cell line activation test (h-CALT)local lymph node assay (LLNA)propolisskin sensitizationTHP-1 cells

Identifiers

PMID34948335
PMCPMC8704603
OpenAlexW4200525866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.